November 5, 2024 - Voter Information Guide 27

Lynda Roberts, Registrar of Voters, Elections

GENERAL ELECTION
Tuesday, November 5, 2024

VOTER INFORMATION GUIDE - Ballot Type 27

  • STATE INFORMATION

    Go to the California Secretary of State's website (opens a new window) for information about Presidential Candidates, U.S. Senate Candidates, and State Propositions.

    Office of United States Senate

    There are two U.S. Senate contests on the November 5, 2024, General Election ballot.

    • The first contest is the regular election for the full 6-year term ending January 3, 2031.
    • The second contest is a special vacancy election (the current officeholder is temporarily filling a vacancy) for the remainder of the current term ending January 3, 2025.

    You may vote for both contests.

The information below is specific to you based on your home address.

If you prefer, download a PDF version of local information for the November 5, 2024 General Election Voter Information Guide 027 (opens a new window).

Open All Panels

 

Index

Important Notice

Important Notice

The sample ballot is for information only. You must vote on the official ballot that will be mailed to you.

Secretary of State’s Voter Hotline 800-345-VOTE (8683) - English

重要通知

樣本選票僅供參考。您必須使用將會寄給您的正式選票來投票。

州務卿選民熱線 (800) 339-2857 - 中文 / Chinese

AVISO IMPORTANTE

La boleta de muestra es solo para fines informativos. Tiene que votar con la boleta oficial enviada por correo.

Línea directa para votantes del Secretario de Estado (800) 232-VOTA (8682) - Español / Spanish

THÔNG BÁO QUAN TRỌNG

Lá phiếu mẫu chỉ để thông tin mà thôi. Quý vị phải bấu trên lá phiếu chính thức sẽ được gửi đến cho quý vị.

Đường Dây Nóng Cử Tri của Ngoại Trưởng (800) 339-8163 - Việt ngữ / Vietnamese

Đường Dây Nóng Cử Tri của Ngoại Trưởng (800) 339-8163 - Việt ngữ / Vietnamese

Endorsments

Candidate Endorsements by Qualified Political Parties

Political Party Endorsements are published pursuant to California Elections Code Sec. 13302(b). Parties may endorse candidates for voter-nominated offices.

  • Republican Party
    Office Candidates
    U.S. Representative District 2 Chris Coulombe
    State Assembly District 12 Andy Podshadley
  • Democratic Party
    Office Candidates
    U.S. Senate (Full Term) Adam Schiff
    U.S. Senate (Partial/Unexpired Term) Adam Schiff
    U.S. Representative District 2 Jared Huffman
    State Assembly District 12 Damon Connolly
  • American Independent Party
    Office Candidates
    State Assembly District 12 Damon Connolly

No other parties submitted endorsements.

Source: State political party central committee notification letters to Registrar of Voters as of August 14, 2024. Parties are listed in order according to the randomized alphabet drawing conducted by Marin County on August 15, 2024.

Candidate Statements

Submitting a candidate statement is optional, so this guide may not contain statements for all candidates. The statement is printed as submitted, and is printed at the expense of the candidate unless otherwise determined by the governing body.

For information about Presidential Candidates and U.S. Senate Candidates, go to the California Secretary of State's website (opens a new window).

STATEMENT OF CANDIDATES

  • STATE OFFICES
    • U.S. REPRESENTATIVE, District 2
      • CHRIS COULOMBE
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Small Business Owner

          Education and Qualifications: We clearly cannot continue down our present political path. We can and must choose a better future.
          Partisan politics is destroying our environment, our economy, and our children’s future. This is our country; it is time for all of us to stand.
          It is no longer about party lines. It is about addressing our reality and our future as a country instead of seeking partisan gain.
          We need clear-eyed leaders with well-rounded experience and vision ready to address those challenges and stay focused on the big picture… focused on moving America forward.
          I was born and raised in Sonoma County. After earning my Eagle Scout, I enlisted in the military at 18 and returned home as an infantry captain 16-years later. I earned my BA in politics from the University of San Francisco and my MA in Diplomacy from Norwich University.
          With 24-years of military, business, and policy experience to represent our 2nd District, and your help, we can protect the environment, rebuild small businesses and the middle class to better our children’s future.
          This is our home and we must protect it. Together, we can lead that change.
          It is my honor to ask for your vote to serve our country again.
          ChrisToCongress.com (opens a new window)

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Ocupación: Propietario de un negocio pequeño

          Educación y cualificaciones: Está claro que no podemos seguir por el camino político actual. Podemos y debemos elegir un futuro mejor.
          La política partidista está destruyendo nuestro medio ambiente, nuestra economía y el futuro de nuestros hijos. Este es nuestro país; es hora de que nos pongamos de pie.
          Ya no se trata de los partidos. Sino que se trata de aceptar nuestra realidad y nuestro futuro como país, en lugar de buscar que gane un partido u otro.
          Necesitamos líderes lúcidos con experiencia y visión integrales, listos para enfrentarse a esos desafíos y mantenerse enfocados en el panorama general... enfocados en hacer avanzar a los Estados Unidos.
          Nací y me crie en el condado de Sonoma. Después de obtener mi Eagle Scout, me alisté en el ejército a los 18 años y regresé a casa como capitán de infantería 16 años después. Obtuve mi licenciatura en Política en la Universidad de San Francisco y mi maestría en Diplomacia en la Universidad de Norwich.
          Con mis 24 años de experiencia militar, empresarial y política para representar a nuestro 2° distrito, y su ayuda, podemos proteger el medio ambiente, reconstruir las pequeñas empresas y la clase media, y mejorar el futuro de nuestros hijos.
          Esta es nuestra casa, y debemos protegerla. Juntos podemos ser líderes de ese cambio.
          Para mí es un honor pedir su voto para volver a servir a nuestro país.
          ChrisToCongress.com (opens a new window)

      • JARED HUFFMAN
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: U.S. Representative

          Education and Qualifications: I’m getting things done despite political chaos in Washington. By putting people over politics, I’ve delivered results – the $400M Golden Gate Bridge seismic retrofit, crucial funding for water supply improvements, zero-emission busses and charging infrastructure, public housing improvements, veterans housing, bike and pedestrian pathways, kelp forest restoration and more.
          The prescription drug pricing reform I championed – the first in decades – caps insulin costs for seniors at $35/month and starting next year total drug costs for seniors will never exceed $2,000/year.
          I spearheaded laws to modernize America’s infrastructure – improving roads and bridges, connecting underserved communities with high-speed broadband, modernizing electrical grids, expanding renewable energy and building a national EV charging network.
          We’re finally taking bold action on the climate crisis and I’m leading the charge to do much more.
          I work across the aisle whenever possible, as with my bipartisan initiative that raised IDEA special education funding by $2.5 billion and my rural hospital bill.
          But when democracy, the rule of law, or our fundamental freedoms are threatened, I fight back. That’s why I founded the Stop Project 2025 Task Force - to confront the dangerous authoritarian scheme pushed by Donald Trump and his allies to eliminate checks and balances, impose a nationwide abortion ban, rollback civil rights and end Medicare as we know it. Not on my watch.
          As a senior member of committees on Natural Resources and Transportation and Infrastructure, you can count on me to keep delivering results.
          I would be honored by your vote.

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Ocupación: Departamento Representante

          Educación y cualificaciones: Estoy haciendo mi trabajo a pesar del caos político en Washington. Al poner a las personas por encima de la política, he obtenido resultados: la rehabilitación sísmica del puente Golden Gate por valor de $400 millones, el financiamiento crucial para mejoras en el suministro de agua, autobuses de cero emisiones e infraestructura de recarga, mejoras en viviendas públicas, viviendas para veteranos de guerra, senderos para bicicletas y peatones, restauración de bosques de algas marinas y mucho más.
          La reforma de precios de medicamentos que requieren receta que defendí, la primera en décadas, limita los costos de la insulina para adultos mayores a $35 al mes y, a partir del próximo año, el costo total de medicamentos para los adultos mayores no superarán los $2,000 al año.
          Impulsé leyes para modernizar la infraestructura de los Estados Unidos: mejora de carreteras y puentes, conexión con banda ancha de alta velocidad a comunidades desatendidas, modernización de las redes eléctricas, expansión de las energías renovables y edificación de una red nacional de recarga de vehículos eléctricos.
          Finalmente estamos tomando medidas audaces para combatir la crisis climática y estoy liderando la lucha para hacer mucho más.
          Colaboro con la oposición siempre que puedo, como ocurre con mi iniciativa bipartidista que aumentó los fondos de educación especial de IDEA en $2.5 mil millones y mi proyecto de ley para hospitales rurales.
          Sin embargo, cuando la democracia, la ley y nuestras libertades fundamentales se ven amenazadas, doy pelea. Es por ello que fundé el grupo de trabajo destinado a detener el Proyecto 2025, para hacer frente al peligroso plan autoritario impulsado por Donald Trump y sus aliados, que busca eliminar los controles y balances, imponer una prohibición al aborto en toda la nación, reducir los derechos civiles y poner fin a Medicare tal como lo conocemos. Esto no sucederá mientras yo esté a cargo.
          En mi calidad de miembro principal de los comités de Recursos Naturales y de Transporte e Infraestructura, prometo seguir obteniendo resultados.
          Para mí será un honor contar con su voto.

    • CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY, District 12
      • DAMON CONNOLLY
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: California State Assemblymember

          Education and Qualifications: It is my privilege to serve as your State Assemblymember, ensuring that an experienced local voice represents Marin and Sonoma counties in Sacramento.
          Endorsed by the Sierra Club, California Professional Firefighters, California Teachers Association, local Labor Unions, and Planned Parenthood Northern California Action Fund, I’m a principled progressive and consensus builder who gets things done.
          In just one term in office, I’ve delivered real results, successfully getting five bills signed into law that will keep body armor out of the hands of mass shooters, ensure addictive tobacco products are not sold to teenagers, protect renters living in mobile home parks, reduce teen suicides, and cap the fees charged for residential solar projects. I also continue to build support for legislation to prevent toxic pesticide spraying along our highways.
          On top of these legislative wins, I also secured $5 million in state funding for projects throughout the North Bay for parks, firefighting equipment, affordable housing, and science education.
          I have been fighting for our communities for 18 years, including service as a Marin County Supervisor, Vice-Mayor of San Rafael, School Board President, California Deputy Attorney General and now, as your State Assemblymember and local voice in Sacramento.
          My values are North Bay values, forged by living here for more than 25 years. As your State Assemblymember, I will continue to fight for our priorities in Sacramento: wildfire prevention and home insurance, clean energy, environmental protection, protecting women’s healthcare, equal rights, and more.
          I hope to earn your vote to continue this important work together.
          https://www.damonconnolly.com (opens a new window)

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Ocupación: Asambleísta del Estado de California

          Educación y cualificaciones: Es un privilegio para mí servir como asambleísta estatal, asegurando que una voz local experimentada represente a los condados de Marin y Sonoma en Sacramento.
          Respaldado por el Sierra Club, los Bomberos Profesionales de California, la Asociación de Maestros de California, los sindicatos locales y el Fondo de Acción del Norte de California de Planificación Familiar, soy un progresista de principios y un creador de consenso que sabe obtener resultados.
          En apenas un mandato, he logrado resultados reales: logré que se promulguen cinco proyectos de ley que mantendrán los chalecos antibalas fuera del alcance de los tiradores en masa, que se garantice que no se vendan productos de tabaco adictivos a los adolescentes, que se proteja a los inquilinos que viven en parques de casas móviles, que se reduzcan los suicidios de adolescentes y que se limiten los cargos que se cobran por proyectos solares residenciales. Además, sigo ganando apoyo para que se implementen leyes que eviten que se rocíen pesticidas tóxicos en los márgenes de nuestras autopistas.
          Además de estas victorias legislativas, también obtuve $5 millones en fondos estatales destinados a proyectos en todo el Norte de la Bahía para parques, equipos contra incendios, viviendas de precio accesible y educación en ciencias.
          Llevo 18 años luchando por nuestras comunidades, incluido el servicio como supervisor del Condado de Marin, Vicealcalde de San Rafael, Presidente de la Junta Escolar, Fiscal General adjunto de California y ahora, como su Asambleísta Estatal y voz local en Sacramento.
          Mis valores son los valores del Norte de la Bahía, forjados en los más de 25 años que llevo viviendo en ese lugar. Como su Asambleísta Estatal, continuaré luchando por nuestras prioridades en Sacramento: prevención de incendios forestales y seguros para el hogar, energía limpia, protección ambiental, protección de la atención médica de las mujeres, igualdad de derechos y más.
          Espero ganar su voto para seguir trabajando juntos.
          https://www.damonconnolly.com (abre una nueva ventana)

      CAMPAIGN FINANCE PLEDGE
      The following candidates for California State Assembly District 12 have pledged to abide by campaign spending limits as specified in California Government Code Sec. 85400 and may publish a 250-word statement of qualifications in this voter guide. Candidates are listed in order according to the randomized alphabet drawing conducted by Marin County on August 15, 2024.

      • ANDREW PODSHADLEY
      • DAMON CONNOLLY
  • SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICES
    • Tamalpais Union High School District, Governing Board Member
      • IDA TIMES-GREEN
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Senior Program Coordinator

          Education and Qualifications: As a life-long resident of Marin City, a fourth generation Tamalpais High School graduate, and former school board member, I recognize the importance of education.
          Having served eight years as a Board Trustee with the Sausalito-Marin City School District, I bring a proven track record of building consensus to achieve collaborative outcomes. I work well with others and respect different perspectives. I am goal-oriented and comfortable taking risks.
          I possess a bachelor’s degree in Humanities and Cultural Studies from Dominican University, and a master’s degree in social work from California State University East Bay. My professional experience includes formerly serving as Social Service case manager with County Behavioral Health & Recovery Services and currently serving as Sr. Program Coordinator for County of Marin Health &Human Services.
          As your representative on the Tamalpais Union High School District Board, I will apply my experience in education, student achievement, and social services to attain better outcomes for our schools and students. I am deeply committed to improving student achievement, specifically among students of color, and closing the gaps to success for all students.
          Student achievement for all students is obtainable. I look forward to working with you to ensure all students thrive.

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Ocupación: Coordinadora en Jefe del Programa

          Educación y cualificaciones: Como habitante de Marin City durante toda mi vida, graduada de la cuarta generación de la escuela secundaria Tamalpais High School y antigua miembro de la junta escolar, reconozco la importancia de la educación.
          Tras ocho años de formar parte de la Junta Directiva del Distrito Escolar de Sausalito-Marin City, aporto un historial demostrado de creación de consenso para obtener resultados en colaboración. Trabajo bien con los demás y respeto las distintas perspectivas. Me oriento al alcance de objetivos y me resulta cómodo asumir riesgos.
          Poseo una licenciatura en Humanidades y Estudios Culturales de la Dominican University y una maestría en Trabajo Social de la California State University East Bay. Mi experiencia profesional incluye haber trabajado como administradora de casos de servicios sociales en los Servicios de Salud Conductual y Recuperación del Condado y, actualmente, como Coordinadora en Jefe de programas de Servicios Humanos y de Salud del Condado de Marin.
          Como su representante en la Junta del Distrito Escolar Tamalpais Union High, aplicaré mi experiencia en educación, logro estudiantil y servicios sociales con el fin de obtener mejores resultados para nuestras escuelas y estudiantes. Estoy profundamente comprometida con mejorar el rendimiento de los estudiantes, especialmente entre los estudiantes de color, y con cerrar las brechas del camino que conduce al éxito de todos los estudiantes.
          El aprovechamiento escolar de todos los alumnos es posible. Deseo y espero trabajar con ustedes para garantizar que todos los alumnos puedan prosperar.

      • JENNIFER HOLDEN
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Mother / Small Businessowner

          Education and Qualifications: As a proud mother of three children, all of whom have attended or are currently attending schools within the district, I understand the challenges and opportunities our students face.
          I have been deeply involved in our public schools for years, volunteering in various capacities since my children were in elementary school. Currently, I am serving my third year as a Board Member of the Archie Williams High School Falcon Foundation, focusing on securing the resources our students need to thrive.
          My candidacy is grounded in my experience as a dedicated community member and parent. I am passionate about creating and supporting an education system that not only focuses on academic standards but also nurtures critical thinking and intellectual growth for all students. Our schools must be equipped with the necessary resources to support our outstanding teachers and implement programs that meet the diverse needs of all students districtwide, while being fiscally prudent.
          Let’s work hand in hand to build a brighter future for our children and our community. I am honored to have earned endorsements from district parents, community leaders, small business owners, elected officials, and others. I humbly ask for your vote. Learn more at Jennifer4SchoolBoard.Org(opens a new window)

      • AMOS KLAUSNER
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Parent

          Education and Qualifications: As a parent of a high school student, a former school board trustee for the Lagunitas School District, husband to a longtime Marin County public school teacher, and current member of the Marin County Committee on School District Reorganization, I understand the issues that impact our school districts, our parent communities, and our children.
          My time as a school board trustee coincided with the COVID-19 outbreak. It was challenging for everyone, especially our kids. It required open communication across stakeholder groups and difficult decision making around health and safety, financial accountability, and academics. With a public school teacher in the family, I appreciate how hard our teachers work and how important great teachers are to our children’s success.
          As part of a county committee, I listen and respond to the needs of taxpayers. If approved, the current Tamalpais Union High School District bond proposal brings an obligation on the part of administrators and the governing board to assure families and taxpayers that this money is well spent. If elected, I will apply tested leadership experience to the district’s use of bond proposal monies as well as the annual budget to assure that every dollar benefits our kids and communities.

      • NICHOLAS ONDREJKA
        • Candidate statement in English

          Age: 52

          Occupation: Business Owner, Parent

          Education and Qualifications:I grew up and attended public schools in Santa Barbara, California. I earned my Bachelors degree in European History and Italian Studies and my Masters of Business Administration from the University of Pennsylvania.
          I moved to San Francisco in 1996 and served over 25 years in leadership roles in technology and financial services. With this experience, I will bring a strong focus on fiscal responsibility, technology investments, and support for our students, teachers and staff.
          In 2016, my family and I moved to Corte Madera where my oldest child enrolled at Redwood. In 2018, I was asked to join the TUHSD’s Fiscal Advisory Committee where I learned about the financial aspects and governance of the District. I was honored to receive a Certificate of Appreciation for my service and was inspired me to ultimately seek a Board Member position.
          In 2023, I started a new property restoration business serving our community. I have a great passion and focus for learning and education for myself, my family and our community. All three of my children have attended or are attending school in the District. I am committed to striving for the best possible educational opportunities for our local high school students balanced with the needs of our community.

  • COUNTY OFFICES
    • COUNTY SUPERVISOR, District 2
      • HEATHER MCPHAIL SRIDHARAN
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Businesswoman

          Education and Qualifications: U.C. Berkeley, B.A.; Oxford University, M.Phil
          We live in a special place. I am running for Supervisor to ensure we retain what makes Marin unique while addressing the important challenges we face today, including: (a) affordable housing, especially for our workforce and older adults, (b) climate change strategies, particularly for wildfires & flood control, (c) fiscal responsibility so we don’t waste tax dollars, & (d) responsive community engagement.
          As a 4th generation Marin native & business owner who has served in local leadership since I was a teenager, I care deeply about our community. I am proud to have earned 600+ local endorsements including Current Ross Valley Mayors: San Anselmo’s Eileen Burke, Fairfax’s Barbara Coler, & Larkspur’s Scot Candell.
          I bring 25+ years of successful corporate experience & 35+ years of public service leadership from being elected Student Body President of Marin Catholic, to President of graduate students at Oxford University, to serving as President of the Kentfield School Board, where I balanced our $20M+ budget.
          I love Marin. I was born here, raised my family of 4 kids in the Ross Valley and intend to ensure that Marin remains a special place. I would be honored to have your vote.
          www.heatherformarin.com (opens a new window)

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Ocupación: Empresaria

          Educación y cualificaciones: U.C. Berkeley, B.A.; Oxford University, M.Phil
          Vivimos en un lugar muy especial. Me estoy postulando para Supervisora para garantizar que conservemos lo que hace que Marin sea único, mientras atendemos los importantes desafíos a los que nos enfrentamos en la actualidad, incluyendo: (a) vivienda de precio accesible, especialmente para nuestra fuerza laboral y adultos mayores, (b) estrategias de cambio climático, particularmente contra incendios forestales y el control de inundaciones, (c) responsabilidad fiscal de manera que no desperdiciemos el dinero de los contribuyentes y (d) un compromiso comunitario receptivo.
          Como originario de Marin de cuarta generación y propietario de un negocio habiendo servido en el liderazgo local local desde que era adolescente, nuestra comunidad me importa profundamente. Tengo el orgullo de haber obtenido el respaldo de más de 600 personalidades locales, incluidos los actuales alcaldes de Ross Valley: Eileen Burke de San Anselmo, Barbara Coler de Fairfax, y Scot Candell de Larkspur.
          Aporto más de 25 años de exitosa experiencia corporativa y más de 35 años de liderazgo en el servicio público, desde que fui elegido Presidente del Cuerpo Estudiantil de Marin Catholic, a Presidente de los estudiantes de postgrado en la Universidad de Oxford, a Presidente de la Junta Escolar de Kentfield, donde equilibré nuestro presupuesto de más de $20 millones.
          Amo a Marin. Nací aquí, crié a mi familia de 4 hijos en Ross Valley y tengo la intención de asegurarme de que Marin siga siendo un lugar especial. Para mí sería un honor contar con su voto.
          www.heatherformarin.com (abre una nueva ventana)

      • BRIAN COLBERT
        • Candidate statement in English

          Age: 56

          Occupation: San Anselmo Councilmember, Marin County Economic Vitality Strategic Plan Steering Committee Member

          Education and Qualifications: I am committed to strengthening Marin’s fundamental values and providing bold solutions to the pressing issues facing our County.
          This is why I became a San Anselmo Town Councilmember and why I am running for Marin County Supervisor.
          Since my election to Town Council in 2017, San Anselmo has thrived. We have a vibrant downtown and a strong sense of community.
          I have a proven track record of balancing leadership with partnership.
          During the unprecedented challenges of COVID, I collaborated with county officials and other cities and towns to ensure Marin remained safe and our local businesses survived.
          I also led the ongoing Reimagine Creek Park project, which created a safe outdoor gathering space when community connection was most needed.
          As Chair of the Transportation Authority of Marin and former Marin County Council of Mayors and Councilmembers President, I have been actively involved in addressing the challenges facing Marin.
          I am supported by the Marin Professional Firefighters because I will focus on emergency preparedness, especially wildfires. As your Supervisor I will prioritize our local economy, protect open spaces, and reduce traffic congestion.
          I am honored to have the support of Congressman Jared Huffman, Assemblymember Damon Connolly, San Rafael Mayor Kate Colin, and Marin County Supervisors Katie Rice, Stephanie Moulton-Peters, Mary Sackett and Eric Lucan. I hope you too will vote Brian Colbert for Marin County Supervisor.
          www.colbertforsupervisor.com (opens a new window)

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Edad: 56

          Ocupación: Concejal de San Anselmo, Miembro del Comité Directivo del Plan Estratégico de Vitalidad Económica del Condado de Marin

          Educación y cualificaciones: Me comprometo a reforzar los valores fundamentales de Marin y a aportar soluciones enérgicas a los problemas apremiantes a los que se enfrenta nuestro Condado.
          Esta es la razón por la que me convertí en Concejal del Ayuntamiento de San Anselmo y por la que me postulo para Supervisor del Condado de Marin.
          Desde mi elección al Concejo Municipal en 2017, San Anselmo ha prosperado. Tenemos un centro vibrante y un sólido sentido de comunidad.
          Tengo un historial comprobado de equilibrio entre liderazgo y colaboración.
          Durante los desafíos sin precedentes del COVID, colaboré con funcionarios del condado y otras ciudades y poblados para garantizar que Marin siguiera siendo seguro y que nuestros negocios locales sobrevivieran.
          También dirigí el proyecto Reimagine Creek Park, el cual sigue en curso y creó un espacio seguro de reunión al aire libre cuando más se necesitaba el contacto entre los miembros de la comunidad.
          Como Presidente de la Autoridad de Transporte de Marin y antiguo Presidente del Concejo de Alcaldes y Concejales del Condado de Marin, he participado activamente en la resolución de los desafíos a los que se enfrenta Marin.
          Cuento con el apoyo de los Bomberos Profesionales de Marin porque me concentraré en la preparación para emergencias, especialmente los incendios forestales. Como su Supervisor daré prioridad a nuestra economía local, protegeré los espacios al aire libre y reduciré la congestión del tráfico.
          Es un honor para mí contar con el apoyo del Congresista Jared Huffman, del Asambleísta Damon Connolly, de la Alcaldesa de San Rafael Kate Colin y de los Supervisores del Condado de Marin Katie Rice, Stephanie Moulton-Peters, Mary Sackett y Eric Lucan. Espero que usted también vote por Brian Colbert para Supervisor del Condado de Marin.
          www.colbertforsupervisor.com (abre una nueva ventana)

  • MUNICIPAL OFFICES
    • City of Larkspur, Member City Council - Full Term
      • GABE PAULSON
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Larkspur Mayor (2023) and Councilmember, Founder/CEO of software company, parent

          Education and Qualifications: I served as Larkspur Mayor in 2023 and have represented our city for five years on wildfire prevention, flood, energy and transportation regional boards. I am excited to take my experience and work on some of the biggest issues Larkspur faces: increasing affordable and locally suitable housing, reducing disaster risk and helping homeowners stay insured, addressing traffic congestion and safety, making Larkspur more age-friendly and reducing teen drug use. I contributed to our transit-oriented housing plan, pushed for senior renter protections, helped keep our budget balanced, promoted public safety, supported small businesses during covid and fought to reduce fentanyl drug use.
          I hold two degrees in physics from Princeton and UCB, founded and am CEO of a software company that created over 30 jobs and am the parent of two wonderful young children in Heather Gardens. I am endorsed by key leaders in affordable housing, disaster preparedness, environmental protection and teen drug prevention. I would be honored to serve you four more to keep Larkspur a wonderful to live now and for future generations!
          I humbly ask for your vote.
          Gabe Paulson
          www.GabeForLarkspur.com (opens a new window)

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Ocupación: Alcalde de Larkspur (2023) y Concejal, Fundador/Director Ejecutivo de una compañía de software, padre de familia

          Educación y cualificaciones: Fui alcalde de Larkspur en 2023 y he representado a nuestra ciudad durante cinco años en juntas regionales de prevención de incendios forestales e inundaciones, energía y transporte. Tengo gran ilusión por aprovechar mi experiencia y trabajar en algunos de los mayores problemas a los que se enfrenta Larkspur: aumentar el número de viviendas de precio accesible y apropiadas para la zona, reducir el riesgo de desastres y ayudar a los propietarios de viviendas a mantenerse cubiertos por un seguro, atender la congestión del tráfico y la seguridad, hacer que Larkspur sea más respetuosa con los adultos mayores y reducir el consumo de drogas entre los adolescentes. Contribuí a nuestro plan de viviendas concebidas tomando en consideración el transporte público, impulsé la protección de los inquilinos de la tercera edad, ayudé a mantener equilibrado nuestro presupuesto, promoví la seguridad pública, apoyé a los negocios pequeños durante la crisis del COVID y luché para reducir el consumo de fentanilo.
          Tengo dos títulos en física de Princeton y UCB, fundé y soy Director Ejecutivo de una compañía de software que creó más de 30 empleos y soy padre de dos maravillosos niños pequeños en Heather Gardens. Cuento con el respaldo de importantes líderes en materia de vivienda de precio accesible, preparación para desastres, protección del medio ambiente y prevención del consumo de drogas entre los adolescentes. ¡Sería un honor servirles cuatro años más para que Larkspur siga siendo un lugar maravilloso en donde vivir en el presente y para las generaciones futuras!
          Pido humildemente su voto.
          Gabe Paulson
          www.GabeForLarkspur.com (abre una nueva ventana)

      • SCOT A. CANDELL
        • Candidate statement in English

          Age: 56

          Occupation: Attorney

          Education and Qualifications: Larkspur is an incredible place to live, and my primary goal as a council member and currently as Mayor has simply been to keep it incredible; to listen to all opinions and in the end do what is best for the City. Larkspur needs leadership that can steer us through upcoming projects including City Hall renovations, a new library and community center, aging sewers in need of repair, an undersupply of affordable housing supply that we must increase responsibly, balancing our budget, and unifying our citizens instead of causing unnecessary divisions.
          Let’s continue to progress in a fair and equitable way that honors our past and embraces our future.
          www.candellforlarkspur.com (opens a new window)
          Scot@candellforlarkspur.com
          Currently serving on the Central Marin Fire Authority; Central Marin Police Authority; Ross Valley Paramedic Authority; Larkspur Library / Community Center Task Force; and the Liaison for Project Homekey Outreach.
          Larkspur resident for 16 years; Graduate of UC Berkeley School of Law; a practicing attorney; Coach of Redwood High School Mock Trial team; and married to Andrea Candell with two sons Jake and Zach.

    • City of Larkspur, Member City Council - Short Term
      • SARAH MARGULIES
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Senior Technology Executive

          Education and Qualifications: I am running for Larkspur City Council because I’m passionate about this beautiful community and want to ensure it thrives while preserving our natural resources and unique history. I promise to champion the needs of residents and local businesses. My priorities are to promote safety, public amenities and inclusivity.
          I have been blessed to call Greenbrae home for 14 years and to have raised my daughters through the public schools. My professional experience in strategic planning, operations and budgeting equip me well for the role. And, I am recognized as a good listener and collaborator, working across stakeholders to find consensus and reach objectives. I am empathetic and commit to representing all Larkspur residents to do the work to make informed decisions that benefit and sustain our community.
          My family has spent many days at Halleck Creek Ranch, The Redwoods and St. Vincent de Paul Society. Other favorite places to be in Marin are on Mt.Tam hiking/running with friends and my dogs and shopping at the Farmers’ Markets.
          Today, with much at stake, I am called into action to protect our beloved community and ensure forward progress. Thinking globally and acting locally is integral to my values. I would be honored to have your vote.

      • LANA SCOTT
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Retired Disability Specialist

          Education and Qualifications: M.Ed., Loyola University
          Having lived in the Bay Area for decades, I understand the importance of affordable housing, education, climate change and access to healthcare and how they interrelate, impacting our daily lives.
          As a certified disability management specialist, I worked with individuals from a variety of socio-economic backgrounds and would like to use this experience on the Council to reach consensus in achieving a common goal.
          I would like to see Larkspur provide much needed affordable housing while maintaining its unique downtown historic district and engaging the public to create new waves of revenue. Having the library and community center reach completion is a major goal as it would greatly benefit children and an aging population.
          I humbly ask for your vote on November 5.
          Lana Scott
          www.lanaforlarkspur.com (opens a new window)

  • SPECIAL DISTRICT OFFICES
    • Marin Municipal Water District, Director - Division 5
      • DAWN MATHESON
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Mother, Engineer, Artist

          Education and Qualifications: My interests and experience are wide-ranging. I received a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering and materials science with an additional major in fine art at Duke University. I then studied computer science at U.C. Berkely and worked on a N.A.S.A. astrophysics project until I got my dream job at Industrial Light and Magic in San Rafael. I worked there for ten years until I had to resign due to family demands. I had special needs twin boys and a husband who had been disabled by meningitis. One of my sons is autistic and he is now a senior at UCLA. The other is studying computer science at COM and working for a local start-up.
          I chose the water board mainly because of its persistent lack of diversity; however, the dearth of trained engineers on the board also made it seem like a good fit. I feel driven to understand and solve problems. From my research and brainstorming, I came up with several ideas but I need an insider’s understanding of the constraints of the system before I can determine the ones that would be the best fit for our area. I hope you give me a chance at that perspective.

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Ocupación: Madre, ingeniera, artista

          Educación y cualificaciones: Mis intereses y experiencia son muy variados. Obtuve una licenciatura en ingeniería mecánica y ciencia de los materiales con una especialización adicional en bellas artes en la Universidad de Duke. Luego estudié ciencias de la computación en la Universidad de Berkeley y trabajé en un proyecto de astrofísica de la NASA hasta que conseguí el trabajo de mis sueños en Industrial Light and Magic, en San Rafael. Trabajé allí durante diez años hasta que tuve que renunciar debido a exigencias familiares. Tenía dos hijos gemelos con necesidades especiales y un marido discapacitado por meningitis. Uno de mis hijos es autista y ahora cursa el último año en la UCLA. El otro estudia ciencias de la computación en el COM y trabaja para una empresa emergente de la localidad.
          Elegí la junta del agua principalmente por su persistente falta de diversidad; sin embargo, la escasez de ingenieros capacitados en la junta también hizo que me pareciera una opción acertada. Me siento inclinada a comprender y resolver problemas. Tras investigar y hacer una lluvia de ideas, se me ocurrieron varias, pero necesito conocer a fondo las limitaciones del sistema antes de poder determinar cuáles serían las más adecuadas para esta zona. Espero que me brinden la oportunidad de evaluar esa perspectiva.

      • LARRY L. RUSSELL
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Water Resources Engineer

          Education and Qualifications: I have served the interests of Southern Marin for 20 years as a member of the MMWD Board.
          As the only Board Member who is a professional water engineer/water management expert, I bring an essential perspective to keeping your water clean and available. As the only Board member to vote against a recent rate increase, that was neither equitable nor fair, I’m focused on keeping your water affordable.
          For the past 49 years, I’ve served as a licensed professional engineer in water resources management. I’ve worked around the world on water supply issues, including on the behalf of the victims of Flint’s Water Crisis. I’m frequently brought before regulatory bodies as an expert witness on water engineering best practices.
          I’m dedicated to the district’s conservation efforts – protecting our valued watershed while securing an adequate supply of high quality drinking water – and meeting our financial challenges with caution and intelligent action.
          Under my leadership, MMWD is doing its part to be a climate change leader.. I helped guide MMWD to finance the Marin Clean Energy’s Deep Green program.
          In this time of significant turnover on the MMWD Board, my extensive engineering and water management expertise is needed now more than ever.

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Ocupación: Ingeniero de Recursos Hídricos

          Educación y cualificaciones: He atendido los intereses del sur del Condado de Marin durante 20 años como miembro de la Junta del MMWD.
          Como único miembro de la Junta que es ingeniero hídrico profesional y experto en la gestión del agua, aporto una perspectiva esencial para mantener el agua de nuestros consumidores limpia y disponible. Como único miembro de la Junta que votó en contra de un reciente aumento en las tarifas, el cual no era ni equitativo ni justo, estoy enfocado en mantener el agua a un precio accesible.
          Durante los últimos 49 años, he ejercido como ingeniero profesional autorizado en la gestión de recursos hídricos. He trabajado en todo el mundo en cuestiones relacionadas con el suministro de agua, incluso en nombre de las víctimas de la crisis del agua en Flint. Con frecuencia comparezco ante organismos reguladores como testigo experto en buenas prácticas de ingeniería hídrica.
          Estoy dedicado a los esfuerzos de conservación del distrito, protegiendo nuestra valiosa cuenca hidrográfica y garantizando al mismo tiempo un suministro adecuado de agua potable de alta calidad, además de hacer frente a nuestros desafíos financieros con cautela y medidas inteligentes.
          Bajo mi liderazgo, el MMWD está haciendo lo que le corresponde para ser líder en materia de cambio climático. Ayudé a guiar al MMWD en el financiamiento del programa Deep Green de Marin Clean Energy. En esta época de cambios significativos en la Junta del MMWD, mi amplia experiencia en ingeniería y gestión del agua es más necesaria que nunca

      • DAVID KEATLEY
        • Candidate statement in English

          Occupation: Director Of Operations

          Education and Qualifications: Just over two years ago, Marin County nearly ran out of water. While we narrowly averted disaster, we need to do a better job of planning and putting the right steps in motion to protect our community.
          The Marin Municipal Water Board must tackle these challenges with fresh eyes and contemporary understanding—owning its responsibility for sustaining a resilient water supply.
          As the father of a young family, I’m aware that the legacy we leave our kids is a critical responsibility. As a business leader, I know the answers are available to us; we know what’s coming. The urgent challenges ahead demand that we plan thoughtfully, think courageously, and act intentionally.
          While serving on the Sierra Lakes County Water District Board, I discovered that years of short-sighted decision-making, lack of forethought, and inadequate funding had left the water infrastructure in poor condition and community vulnerable. I led the effort to make changes which resulted in greater system resilience and community safety.
          I bring experience, passion, creativity, and fresh vision to this task. With regional and community engagement and a willingness to listen to new ideas and challenge old assumptions, we can build a strong foundation for a sustainable future.
          DaveForMarinWater.com (opens a new window)

        • Declaración de candidatos en español

          Ocupación: Director de Operaciones

          Educación y cualificaciones: Hace poco más de dos años, el agua estuvo a punto de agotarse en el Condado de Marin. Aunque evitamos el desastre por muy poco, tenemos que planificar mejor y poner en marcha las medidas adecuadas para proteger a nuestra comunidad.
          La Junta Municipal de Agua de Marin debe afrontar estos desafíos con una nueva perspectiva y una concepción contemporánea, asumiendo su responsabilidad de mantener un suministro de agua resiliente.
          Como padre de una familia joven, soy consciente de que el legado que dejamos a nuestros hijos es una responsabilidad de importancia crítica. Como líder empresarial, sé que las respuestas están a nuestro alcance; sabemos lo que nos espera. Los urgentes desafíos que nos aguardan exigen que planifiquemos cuidadosamente, pensemos con valentía y actuemos con determinación.
          Mientras formaba parte de la Junta del Distrito de Agua del Condado de Sierra Lakes, descubrí que años de tomar decisiones con poca visión en el futuro, la falta de previsión y el financiamiento inadecuado habían dejado la infraestructura del agua en malas condiciones y a la comunidad vulnerable. Dirigí las iniciativas para introducir cambios que aumentaran la resiliencia del sistema y la seguridad de la comunidad.
          Aporto experiencia, pasión, creatividad y una nueva visión a esta tarea. Con la participación regional y comunitaria, y la voluntad de escuchar nuevas ideas y cuestionar viejas suposiciones, podemos construir la base sólida de un futuro sostenible.
          DaveForMarinWater.com (abre una nueva ventana)

Measure Info

For information about the State Propositions, go to the California Secretary of State's website (opens a new window) .

Arguments in "support of" or in "opposition to" the proposed laws are the opinions of the authors.

  • Measure B – Tamalpais Union High School

    To complete high priority repairs and upgrades at local high schools, including replacing classrooms/ science labs/ technology; repairing/ replacing leaky roofs and inefficient heating/ cooling/ electrical/ plumbing systems; updating art/ music classrooms/ facilities; and replacing outdated portable classrooms, shall Tamalpais Union High School District’s measure be adopted authorizing $289,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $18 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($20,700,000 annually) with independent oversight, audits, no funds for administrators and all funds locally controlled?

    BONDS—YES                             BONDS—NO

    Votes required to pass: 55% voter approval
    Bonds for school facility improvement projects

    • IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL OF MEASURE B

      TAMALPAIS UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
      BOND MEASURE

      MEASURE B

      This Measure was placed on the ballot by the Board of Trustees of the Tamalpais Union High School District.

      Pursuant to Article XIIIA (1)(b)(3) of the California Constitution, if this measure is approved by 55% of the votes cast, the Tamalpais Union High School District will be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in multiple series of up to two hundred eighty-nine million dollars ($289,000,000) with an interest rate not to exceed the limit set by law.

      Money raised by bond sales may only be used for the purposes and projects stated in the Bond Project List set forth in Measure B. These purposes and projects include, but are not limited to, replacing and/or expanding classroom buildings at Tamalpais High School, Redwood High School and Archie Williams High School, as well as other priority projects. As required by law, Measure B prohibits using bond proceeds for teacher and administrator salaries or other operating expenses.

      The District estimates the average projected tax rate necessary to fund the bonds will be $17.60 per $100,000 of assessed value of property while the bonds are outstanding. This estimate is a projection, and could go up or down, depending on a number of factors including the timing and amount of bond sales, and changes in assessed property values in the District. If all the bonds are sold, the District estimates total debt service (including the principal and interest) will be approximately $579,200,000. If the bond issuance is authorized, it will commence in fiscal year 2025-26 and the final fiscal year in which it is anticipated that the revenue will be collected is 2052-53.

      The Measure requires annual independent financial audits and spending review by an independent citizens’ oversight committee.

      s/BRIAN E. WASHINGTON
      County Counsel

    • TAX RATE STATEMENT OF MEASURE B

      MEASURE B

      An election will be held within the boundaries of Tamalpais Union High School District (“District”) on November 5, 2024 to authorize the sale of up to $289 million in bonds to finance facilities as described in the measure. If the bonds are approved, the District expects to sell the bonds in multiple series. Principal and interest on the bonds will be payable from the proceeds of tax levies made upon the taxable property located within the District. The following information is provided in compliance with Sections 9400 to 9404, inclusive, of the California Elections Code.

      1. The best estimate from official sources of the average annual tax rate that would be required to be levied to fund this bond issue over the entire duration of the bond debt service, based on assessed valuations available at the time of the election, a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction and other demonstrable factors, is estimated to be $17.60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation. The final fiscal year in which the tax is anticipated to be collected is 2052-53.
      2. The best estimate from official sources of the highest tax rate that would be required to be levied to fund this bond issue, and an estimate of the year in which that rate will apply, based on assessed valuations available at the time of filing this statement, a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction and other demonstrable factors, is estimated to be $17.60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation first occurring in fiscal year 2025-26.
      3. The best estimate from official sources of the total debt service, including the principal and interest, that would be required to be repaid if all the bonds are issued and sold is $579.2 million.

      Voters should note that the estimated tax rate is based on the ASSESSED VALUE of taxable property on the Marin County official tax rolls, not on the property’s market value. Property owners should consult their own property tax bills to determine their property’s assessed value and any applicable tax exemptions. For illustration purposes only, a home with the current approximate median residential assessed value in the District of $1.1 million (as of 2023-24) would pay approximately $194 in initial annual property taxes based on the tax rate of $17.60 per $100,000 of assessed value. Annual increases in the assessed value of a property (without an ownership change or reassessment) are limited to 2% and other limitations provided by Proposition 13 from 1978.

      Attention of all voters is directed to the fact that the foregoing information is based upon the District’s projections and estimates only, which are not binding upon the District. The actual tax rates, debt service and the years in which they will apply may vary from those presently estimated, due to variations from these estimates in the timing of bond sales, the amount of bonds sold and market interest rates at the time of each sale, and actual assessed valuations over the term of repayment of the bonds. The dates of sale and the amount of bonds sold at any given time will be determined by the District based on need for construction funds and other factors. The actual interest rates at which the bonds will be sold will depend on the bond market at the time of each sale. Actual future assessed valuation will depend upon the amount and value of taxable property within the District as determined by the County Assessor in the annual assessment and the equalization process.

      DR. TARA TAUPIER, Superintendent

      In accordance with Education Code Section 15122.5:
      Approval of Measure B does not guarantee that the proposed project or projects in the Tamalpais Union High School District that are the subject of bonds under Measure B will be funded beyond the local revenues generated by Measure B. The school district’s proposal for the project or projects may assume the receipt of matching state funds, which could be subject to appropriation by the Legislature or approval of a statewide bond measure.

    • ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE B

      Vote YES on B: a responsible plan to replace outdated and deteriorating high school classrooms and prevent cuts to instructional programs.

      Our local high schools in Tamalpais Union High School District consistently rank among the best.

      Aging and deteriorating classrooms, labs, and school facilities need urgent upgrades to keep students safe and support quality instruction.

      Most local high schools are over 60 years old and Tam High is over 100 years old. The last improvement bond passed almost two decades ago.

      Following the narrow defeat of a bond measure earlier this year, Tamalpais Union High School District leaders worked with the community to develop a scaled-down proposal focused on only the most essential projects. Measure B is the result.

      Measure B is 45% smaller than the last measure and will provide $289,000,000 in locally controlled funding that is equitably distributed to specific projects at each high school.

      The State does not fund facility improvements so upgrades to local high schools require local funding. Without Measure B, funds would have to be diverted from teaching and classroom instruction to urgent roof and HVAC repairs for schools to function.

      Voting Yes on B funds only urgent and essential improvements:

      • Replacing the most outdated and obsolete classrooms, science labs, classroom technology, and equipment
      • Repairing leaky roofs and inefficient heating, cooling, electrical, and plumbing systems
      • Converting outdated and deteriorating temporary portable classrooms to permanent structures

      Mandatory fiscal accountability and local control:

      • A detailed project list describes specifically how funds would be used
      • Independent oversight, audits, and public spending disclosures ensure funds are spent as promised
      • Every penny is locally controlled and cannot be taken by the State
      • No funds can be used for administrator salaries

      Protecting quality education in local schools is good for students, good for our community, and good for home values.

      Join trusted local leaders in voting Yes on B.

      JARED HUFFMAN
      U.S. Congressman, California’s 2nd District

      STEPHANIE MOULTON-PETERS
      Marin County Supervisor, District 3

      LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MARIN COUNTY
      Kevin M. Hagerty, President

      CHUCK FORD
      Former TUHSD Trustee & 50-year Marin resident

      BITSA FREEMAN
      Marin Native, TUHSD Alum and Parent, Realtor

    • REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE B

      No rebuttal to argument in favor of Measure B was filed.

    • ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE B

      People have reached their limits and ability to pay more taxes, Measure B directs money to aspirational “vanity” projects. There are no senior exemptions and no plans to ensure improved academic performance.

      No money goes to reversing weak academic performance. California’s school-dashboard shows TUHSD performing poorly https://www.caschooldashboard.org/ (opens a new window) Instead of a reasonable parcel tax for improved academics, that allows senior exemptions, the Board opts for new construction at Redwood: a $73,100,000 kitchen remodel, new multipurpose “eating area” and replacing art and music buildings with new, larger ones. These are not “critical” safety needs as the Board claims in order to scare voters.

      While identifying only $80,000,000 in “critical” needs for roofs and HVAC earlier this year, now they redefine everything they want as a critical need. That balloons the bond measure to $289,000,000 ($579,200,000 with interest). Much of what they deem “critical” is of their own creation – deferring maintenance while funding ten new senior administrator positions. Students deserve that money directed back to their education.

      Measure B offers no exemptions for seniors or low-income families who will be pushed out of Marin by increasing taxes, insurance, and utility bills.

      When enrollment is declining and many students are struggling, new fancy buildings shouldn’t be the top priority.

      To regain Archie Williams High School area voters, who were shortchanged in failed Measure A, this bond adds a non-critical $11,300,000 AWHS theater renovation. AWHS voters are still shortchanged at receiving only 14.3% of the bond proceeds.

      Who wants all this Tam Union construction? Most of the roughly $270,000 contributed to political campaigns to pass these 2024 Tam Union bond measures comes from companies who will profit financially.

      The board must prioritize fixing Tam Union’s REAL problems: declining academic performance, not “vanity” projects. Voters will approve a smaller bond or parcel tax if there’s demonstrated need.

      Vote NO.

      BENEDETTO CICO
      Business Owner

      PASCAL SISICH
      Former Planning Commissioner, Library & Sales Tax Oversight Committee Member

      KATHY FLORES
      District Resident & Voter

      DIANA K. PERDUE
      Retired Senior

      MICHAEL MACKINTOSH
      Local Business Owner

    • REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE B

      The opponents are wrong and are spreading misinformation.

      Misinformation: Local high schools are performing poorly.

      Truth: Academic performance in our schools is among the best in the State and Nation. The opposition is intentionally misrepresenting TUHSD’s academic performance via the Dashboard. 98% of TUHSD students graduate, 80% meet University of California entrance requirements, and admission rates to elite colleges rival that of private schools.

      Misinformation: Measure B funds nonessential “vanity” projects.

      Truth: Following the narrow defeat of Measure A, TUHSD listened to the community and reduced the proposal by 44% to focus on the most urgent and essential needs (tuhsdfacilities.org). The opponents’ misleading description of a $73 million kitchen remodel is in fact a multi-pronged project to replace several of Redwood’s oldest, deteriorating, and obsolete buildings. They must be replaced, not remodeled, as required by state law, and do not expand capacity.

      Misinformation: Archie Williams High School gets 14% of the funding.

      Truth: Archie Williams High gets 21% of Measure B funding, which is roughly equivalent to its percentage of district enrollment at 25%.

      Misinformation: Measure B offers no exemptions.

      Truth: State law does not allow exemptions for school facilities bonds and bonds are the only practical way to fund school improvements. However, the cost to taxpayers is based on the assessed value of properties so longtime residents and owners of less expensive homes pay the least.

      Vote Yes on B — a modest and sensible plan that will provide essential upgrades to support safety and quality education, while protecting devastating cuts to teachers, staff, and programs.

      JOHN CARROLL
      Marin County Superintendent of Schools

      ELAINE PETROCELLI
      Founder and President, Book Passage Bookstore

      FELECIA GASTON
      Executive Director, Performing Stars of Marinand 34 year Marin City resident

      RUTH DELL
      Retired President of TUHSD Board of Trusteesand Marin County School Board Association

      DAVE CORT
      Community Leader and 45+ year West Marin resident

    • FULL TEXT OF MEASURE B

      LOCAL HIGH SCHOOL HIGH PRIORITY CLASSROOM REPAIR AND UPGRADE MEASURE

      By approval of this measure by at least fifty-five percent (55%) of the registered voters voting thereon, the Tamalpais Union High School District (“District”) shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $289,000,000 in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed below in the Bond Project List, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified herein.

      SECTION I: KEY FINDINGS

      • Tamalpais Union High School District (“District”) strives to provide every student with a high quality education in a safe and modern learning environment, so that they graduate with the skills and knowledge needed for success in college and future careers.
      • Tam High is over 100 years old, Redwood and Archie Williams are over 60 years old, and the last significant repairs and upgrades were completed almost 20 years ago.
      • Working with architects and school construction experts, the District conducted a thorough assessment of every classroom and school facility to identify and prioritize needed repairs and upgrades.
      • Outdated and deteriorating classrooms, science labs, career training facilities, and failing school infrastructure directly impact student safety, learning and the quality of education available to local students.
      • Many classrooms and school buildings that have been used daily for decades by thousands of high school students are deteriorating, worn out, have leaky roofs, are not accessible for students with disabilities, and have aging and inefficient plumbing, electrical, heating and cooling systems.
      • Outdated classrooms, labs and job training facilities were built to meet past educational standards and need upgrades to support current standards for advanced instruction in science, technology, engineering, arts and math.
      • Outdated and deteriorating classrooms and school buildings present risks to student safety and campus security, requiring upgrades to remove hazardous materials like asbestos and lead, improve campus security, and meet current fire and earthquake safety standards.
      • All students need appropriate sheltered eating areas to ensure safety during inclement weather including rain, wildfire smoke and extreme heat.
      • Because the State does not provide sufficient or dedicated funding for school facility improvements, local funding is needed to address urgent repairs and upgrades at local high schools.
      • Without local funding from a voter-approved school improvement bond measure, limited funding that currently supports teacher salaries, educational programming and learning materials will have to be diverted to urgent and essential repairs to roofs, heating and ventilation systems that cannot be delayed.
      • Diverting approximately $80 million in instructional funding to urgent facility repairs would likely require significant reductions to academic programs, student support services, and teaching positions.
      • To repair and upgrade outdated and failing classrooms, labs and school facilities, and protect limited funding for teaching and academic programs, the Board of Trustees believes that dedicated funding for facility improvements from a voter-approved bond measure is needed.
      • Following the narrow defeat of the Measure A bond proposal on the March 2024 ballot, the District listened to community feedback and developed a reduced bond proposal that eliminates lower priority improvements and focuses on the most urgent and essential identified repairs and improvements.
      • In developing a revised and reduced bond proposal, the Board has sought to ensure that funds are allocated consistently across the five District high schools on a per-student basis, while prioritizing the most urgent identified needs at each campus.
      • In developing a revised and reduced bond proposal, the Board has sought to ensure that cost of the proposed measure is less than is paid by taxpayers toward school facility improvements in other comparable Marin County and Bay Area school districts.
      • In developing a revised and reduced bond proposal, the District has developed a detailed school by school project list with updated cost estimates focused on the most urgent high priority repairs and upgrades.
      • The revised bond proposal will address priority improvements, such as:
        • Replacing outdated and obsolete classrooms, science labs, technology, and equipment;
        • Repairing or replacing leaking and deteriorating roofs;
        • Repairing or replacing outdated and inefficient heating, cooling, electrical and plumbing systems;
        • Updating career and job training classrooms to meet current educational standards;
        • Updating art, music and performing arts classrooms; and
        • Replacing outdated, deteriorating and failing temporary portable classrooms.
      • Proceeds from a voter-approved school facilities improvement bond measure would be controlled locally for District high schools only and could not be taken away by the State.
      • None of the money raised may be used for administrators’ salaries or pensions or other school operating expenses.
      • An independent citizens’ oversight committee, mandatory annual audits and public disclosure of all spending will help ensure funds are only spent on voter-approved projects.

      SECTION II: ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES

      The provisions in this section are included in this proposition in order that the voters and taxpayers of the District may be assured that their money will be spent to address specific facilities needs of the District, all in compliance with the requirements of Article XIII A, section 1(b)(3) of the State Constitution, and the Strict Accountability in Local School Construction Bonds Act of 2000 (codified at Section 15264 et seq. of the California Education Code).

      Evaluation of Needs. The Board of Trustees has evaluated the facilities needs of the District and has identified projects to finance from a local bond measure at this time. The Board of Trustees has certified that it has evaluated safety, class size reduction and information technology needs in developing the Bond Project List.

      Independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee. The Board of Trustees shall establish an independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee in accordance with Education Code sections 15278-15282 and applicable Board policy, to ensure bond proceeds are expended only for the school facilities projects listed in the Bond Project List. The committee shall be established within sixty (60) days of the date when the Board of Trustees enters the results of the election in its official minutes.

      Annual Performance Audit. The Board of Trustees shall conduct or cause to be conducted an annual, independent performance audit to ensure that the bond proceeds have been expended only on the school facilities projects described in the Bond Project List.

      Annual Financial Audit. The Board of Trustees shall conduct or cause to be conducted an annual, independent financial audit of the bond proceeds until all of those proceeds have been spent.

      Annual Report to Board. Upon approval of this measure and the sale of any bonds approved, the Board of Trustees shall take actions necessary to establish an account in which proceeds of the sale of bonds will be deposited. As long as any proceeds of the bonds remain unexpended, the Superintendent shall cause a report to be filed with the Board of Trustees no later than January 1 of each year, commencing on the first January 1 after bonds have been issued and proceeds spent, stating (1) the amount of bond proceeds received and expended in the past fiscal year, and (2) the status of any project funded or to be funded from bond proceeds. The report may be incorporated into the annual budget, annual financial report, or other appropriate routine report to the Board.

      SECTION III: BOND PROJECT LIST

      This Bond Project List, which is an integral part of this proposition, describes the specific projects the District proposes to finance with proceeds of the bonds. All information contained within this “Section III: Bond Project List” comprises the list and description of permissible projects and expenses that may be paid from bond proceeds.

      In order to meet all identified facility needs, the District intends to complete projects using a combination of funding sources, including joint use funds or contributions, development impact fees, and state funding (if available). The District will pursue state matching funds if and when they become available, and if received, they will be used for projects on the Bond Project List or other high priority capital outlay expenditures as permitted by law. Approval of this measure does not guarantee that all projects on this Bond Project List at all listed sites will be funded beyond the local revenues generated by this measure. The District’s proposal for the projects assumes the receipt of some state matching funds, which could be subject to appropriation by the Legislature or approval of a statewide bond measure. Bond funds may be used to meet any matching share contribution requirements.

      Specific projects that may be funded by bond proceeds include projects in Category A and Category B, list below. Category A projects are intended to be completed at the site indicated. Category B projects may be completed at any and all school sites, buildings and facilities where such project is determined necessary or required, including without limitation, adult education facilities, administrative and support buildings, and alternative education program facilities. Whether and how a project is described in Category A does not limit the District’s ability to perform a Category B project at any particular site.

      Specific projects to be funded by the bond measure include the following:

      Category A: Site-Specific Campus Upgrades to Prepare Students for College and Careers and Comply with Safety, Accessibility and Educational Standards

      ARCHIE WILLIAMS HIGH SCHOOL

      • Renovate and expand Performing Arts Center, including:
        • Renovate / expand existing theater and music and drama classroom building, new lobby with restrooms, new dressing rooms, upgrade performance lighting;
        • Make required ADA improvements; install new systems and finishes;
      • Demolish and remove Creekside portables and replace with outdoor learning areas;
      • Replace baseball and football fields;
      • Resurface track;
      • Upgrade/modernize athletic fieldhouse;
      • Replace storage buildings.

      REDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL

      • Construct Music, Fine Arts Classroom Buildings and Multi-Purpose Eating Area, including:
        • New music classroom building
        • New arts and ceramics classroom building
        • New multi-purpose sheltered eating area
        • Temporary housing in leased portables
        • Hazardous materials abatement and demolition of existing buildings
        • Replacement of site utilities, including sewer line replacement and relocation of main electrical service and emergency generator
      • Replace Ghilotti Field athletic turf;
      • Expand/renovate existing kitchen, dining, and food service areas;
      • Resurface track;
      • Replaster pool.

      TAMALPAIS HIGH SCHOOL

      • Replace Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts & Math (STEAM) Building, including:
        • New 4-story building containing 14 science, math, engineering and arts classrooms and labs and a replacement music classroom building;
        • Temporary housing in leased portables;
        • Hazardous materials abatement and demolition and removal of existing buildings;
        • Extensive grading and site utilities.
      • Replace elevator for disability access and fire escapes;
      • Upgrade/modernize kitchen, food service and dining areas;
      • Resurface track;
      • Replaster pool;
      • Replace storage buildings.

      Category B: Districtwide Campus Upgrades to Support Student Health, Safety and Security

      The following projects are authorized to be completed at each, any or all of the District’s schools, sites, buildings and facilities if and where determined necessary:

      • Replace deteriorating and leaky roofs;
      • Replace heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems;
      • Repair and replace deteriorating student restrooms;
      • Replace, upgrade plumbing and irrigation systems, including associated asphalt repairs;
      • Upgrade restrooms and path of travel to improve access for students with disabilities and meet current Americans with Disabilities Act requirements;
      • Provide solar photovoltaic parking structures and electric vehicle charging stations to offset energy usage, reduce carbon footprint and promote sustainable practices.
      • Improve technology infrastructure to increase bandwidth Districtwide and enhance network-based content and curriculum delivery; acquire and/or improve classroom technology, upgrade backbone systems wireless access points, switches, and MDF/IDF data rooms with environmental controls

      Listed projects, repairs, improvements, rehabilitation projects and upgrades will be completed only as needed, and the listing of projects does not imply a particular prioritization among such improvements; however, the Board’s top priorities for improvements include the renovation and expansion of the performing arts center at Archie Williams High School; the construction of the music, fine arts classroom buildings and multi-purpose eating area at Redwood High School and the replacement of the STEAM building at Tamalpais High School. Projects may be done in phases, based on Board of Trustees priorities available funding. Decisions regarding the scope, timing, prioritization or other facets of project implementation will be made solely by the Board of Trustees by subsequent action. Where terms such as “renovate,” “upgrade,” “replace,” and “improve” are used in the Bond Project List, the Board of Trustees has the discretion to determine the best method for accomplishing the project’s objective, including the use of new construction. For any listed project involving renovation or modernization of a building or the major portion of a building, the District may proceed with new replacement construction instead (including any necessary demolition), if the District determines that replacement and new construction is more practical than renovation, considering the building’s age, condition, expected remaining life, comparative cost and other relevant factors. In addition, where feasible, projects may be completed in partnership with other public or private agencies on a joint use basis using bond proceeds, subject to federal tax rules and regulations.

      Each project is assumed to include its share of costs of bond issuance, architectural, engineering, legal and similar planning costs; litigation costs; construction management; bond project consultants; staff development and training expenses associated with learning construction techniques and approaches and new bond-funded equipment and systems; the furnishing and equipping of all projects, including equipment to maintain facilities in a safe and clean condition; and a customary contingency for unforeseen design and construction costs. Payment of the costs of preparation of facilities planning and project implementation studies, feasibility and assessment reviews, master planning, environmental studies, permit and inspection fees, Division of State Architect (DSA) - related requirements, studies and assessments, including ADA and seismic, and temporary housing and relocation costs for dislocated programs or activities caused or necessitated by projects on the Bond Project List are permissible bond expenditures.

      The final cost of each project will be determined as plans are finalized and projects are completed. Based on the final costs of each project, certain of the projects described above may be delayed or may not be completed. Necessary site preparation, grading or restoration may occur in connection with acquisition of property, new construction, modernization, renovation or remodeling, or installation or removal of modular classrooms, including ingress and egress, removing, replacing or installing irrigation, utility lines, trees and landscaping, relocating fire access roads and acquiring any necessary easements, leases, licenses or rights of way to the property.

      SECTION IV: ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATIONS

      No Operating Expenses. Proceeds from the sale of Bonds authorized by this proposition shall be used only for the construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or replacement of school facilities on the Bond Project List, including the furnishing and equipping of said school facilities, or the acquisition or lease of real property for said school facilities, and not for any other purpose, including teacher or administrator salaries and other school operating expenses in accordance with applicable law.

      Single Purpose. All of the purposes enumerated in this proposition shall be united and voted upon as one single proposition, pursuant to Section 15100 of the California Education Code, and all the enumerated purposes shall constitute the specific single purpose of the bonds and proceeds of the bonds shall be spent only for such purpose.

      Other Terms of the Bonds. The bonds may be issued and sold in several series, and in accordance with a financing plan determined by the Board of Trustees pursuant to requirements of law. When sold, the bonds shall bear interest at an annual rate not exceeding the statutory maximum and with a maximum term not exceeding the statutory maximum, provided that the average useful life of bonds sold will not exceed one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the average life of the projects being financed or as otherwise provided by federal tax law. Bond funds may be used to reimburse the District for Bond Project list expenditures incurred prior to the election and bond issuance, in accordance with federal tax law.

      Attention of all voters is directed to the fact that the financial information contained in this measure is based upon the District’s projections and estimates only, which are not binding upon the District, nor are the summary or average payment estimates, if any, provided in the Ballot Label. The actual tax rates, debt service and the years in which they will apply may vary from those presently estimated, due to variations from these estimates in the timing of bond sales, the amount of bonds sold and market interest rates at the time of each sale, and actual assessed valuations over the term of repayment of the bonds. The dates of sale and the amount of bonds sold at any given time will be determined by the District based on need for construction funds and other factors. The actual interest rates at which the bonds will be sold will depend on the bond market at the time of each sale. Actual future assessed valuation will depend upon the amount and value of taxable property within the District as determined by the County Assessor in the annual assessment and the equalization process.

      In preparing this information, the District obtained reasonable and informed projections of assessed property valuations that took into consideration projections of assessed property valuations made by the County Assessor, if any, in accordance with Education Code Section 15100(c).

  • Measure E – Kentfield School District

    Kentfield School District Safe, Warm and Dry Schools Measure. To repair and upgrade Bacich Elementary School and Kent Middle School; repair or replace failing roofs; protect safe drinking water; repair deteriorating student restrooms and plumbing; and improve campus fencing, energy and security, shall Kentfield School District’s measure be adopted authorizing $48,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $29 per $100,000 of assessed value ($3,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, requiring independent oversight, annual audits and all funds locally controlled for Kentfield schools only?

    BONDS—YES                             BONDS—NO

    Votes required to pass: 55% voter approval
    Bonds for school facility improvement projects

    • IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL OF MEASURE E

      KENTFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT
      BOND MEASURE

      MEASURE E

      This Measure was placed on the ballot by the Board of Trustees of the Kentfield School District.

      Pursuant to Article XIIIA (1)(b)(3) of the California Constitution, if this measure is approved by 55% of the votes cast, the Kentfield School District will be authorized to incur bonded indebtedness in multiple series of up to forty-eight million dollars ($48,000,000) with an interest rate not to exceed the limit set by law.

      Money raised by bond sales may only be used for the purposes and projects stated in the Bond Project List set forth in Measure E. These purposes and projects at Bacich Elementary School and Kent Middle School include repairing or replacing roofs, repairing restrooms and plumbing, and improving safety systems. As required by law, Measure E prohibits using bond proceeds for teacher and administrator salaries or other operating expenses.

      The District estimates the average projected tax rate necessary to fund the bonds will be $29 per $100,000 of assessed value of property while the bonds are outstanding. This estimate is a projection, and could go up or down, depending on a number of factors including the timing and amount of bond sales, and changes in assessed property values in the District. If all the bonds are sold, the District estimates total debt service (including the principal and interest) will be approximately $96,000,000. If the bond issuance is authorized, it will commence in fiscal year 2025-26 and the final fiscal year in which it is anticipated that the revenue will be collected is 2051-52.

      The Measure requires annual independent financial audits and spending review by an independent citizens’ oversight committee.

      s/BRIAN E. WASHINGTON
      County Counsel

    • TAX RATE STATEMENT OF MEASURE E

      An election will be held within the boundaries of Kentfield School District (“District”) on November 5, 2024 to authorize the sale of up to $48 million in bonds to finance facilities as described in the measure. If the bonds are approved, the District expects to sell the bonds in multiple series. Principal and interest on the bonds will be payable from the proceeds of tax levies made upon the taxable property located within the District. The following information is provided in compliance with Sections 9400 to 9404, inclusive, of the California Elections Code.

      1. The best estimate from official sources of the average annual tax rate that would be required to be levied to fund this bond issue over the entire duration of the bond debt service, based on assessed valuations available at the time of the election, a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction and other demonstrable factors, is estimated to be $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation. The final fiscal year in which the tax is anticipated to be collected is 2051-52.
      2. The best estimate from official sources of the highest tax rate that would be required to be levied to fund this bond issue, and an estimate of the year in which that rate will apply, based on assessed valuations available at the time of filing this statement, a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction and other demonstrable factors, is estimated to be $29 per $100,000 of assessed valuation first occurring in fiscal year 2025-26.
      3. The best estimate from official sources of the total debt service, including the principal and interest, that would be required to be repaid if all the bonds are issued and sold is $96 million.

      Voters should note that the estimated tax rate is based on the ASSESSED VALUE of taxable property on the Marin County official tax rolls, not on the property’s market value. Property owners should consult their own property tax bills to determine their property’s assessed value and any applicable tax exemptions.

      Attention of all voters is directed to the fact that the foregoing information is based upon the District’s projections and estimates only, which are not binding upon the District. The actual tax rates, debt service and the years in which they will apply may vary from those presently estimated, due to variations from these estimates in the timing of bond sales, the amount of bonds sold and market interest rates at the time of each sale, and actual assessed valuations over the term of repayment of the bonds. The dates of sale and the amount of bonds sold at any given time will be determined by the District based on need for construction funds and other factors. The actual interest rates at which the bonds will be sold will depend on the bond market at the time of each sale. Actual future assessed valuation will depend upon the amount and value of taxable property within the District as determined by the County Assessor in the annual assessment and the equalization process.

      Raquel Rose, Superintendent

      In accordance with Education Code Section 15122.5:
      Approval of Measure E does not guarantee that the proposed project or projects in the Kentfield School District that are the subject of bonds under Measure E will be funded beyond the local revenues generated by Measure E. The school district’s proposal for the project or projects may assume the receipt of matching state funds, which could be subject to appropriation by the Legislature or approval of a statewide bond measure.

    • ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE E

      Vote Yes on E to provide all Kentfield students with a safe learning environment!

      Kentfield School District strives to deliver every student a high-quality and well-rounded education for the future. While we love our local schools, many of them do not meet modern safety standards.

      School facility experts, architects, and engineers have identified that Kentfield Schools need basic repairs and maintenance to keep our schools functioning and our students and staff safe.

      Your YES vote on E ensures that all Kentfield School District schools can maintain the high quality of education our students deserve.

      Deteriorating restrooms, leaky roofs, and old campus fencing are threatening student security. Aging plumbing is impacting our children’s access to safe drinking water. Outdated classrooms need upgraded infrastructure to preserve our high-quality innovative instruction, which helps to prepare our students for higher education and modern careers.

      YES on E will:

      • Repair plumbing for safe drinking water
      • Repair and replace leaky roofs
      • Repair deteriorating student restrooms and outdated plumbing
      • Upgrade classrooms and school facilities to keep students safe, warm, and dry
      • Complete maintenance to prevent weather damage
      • Improve school technology infrastructure
      • Improve campus fencing and security systems

      Local Control & Transparency

      • All funds for Bacich Elementary School and Kent Middle School ONLY and cannot be taken by the State
      • Independent oversight, mandatory annual audits, and public disclosure of all spending required
      • By law, no funds for administrators’ salaries or pensions

      Great schools improve the quality of life in our community and protect property values.

      Help us keep Kentfield students safe, warm, and dry. Join community members, teachers, and parents – YES on E to maintain up-to-date neighborhood schools!

      HEATHER McPHAIL SRIDHARAN
      Former President, Kentfield School District Board of Trustees

      THOMAS POSER
      Real estate broker, Former KIK Board Member

      CATHERINE FLORES
      Marin County Educator of the Year, Parent

      ROSS McKENNA
      Marin County Realtor, 30 Year Resident

      ANN MATHIESON
      Retired Trustee, Kentfield School District Board of Trustees

    • REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE E

      Measure E asks you and future generations to fund a 25-year slush fund to nibble at neglected maintenance. Despite having one of the hugest parcel taxes in the state, and TWO existing bond measures we’re still paying for, KSD purports to have a very large amount of unaddressed deferred maintenance. THAT is what prompts Measure E.

      In KSD’s instance, the campus was recently substantially upgraded via the 2014 bond. The 2024 bond is primarily for neglected maintenance. Their consultant’s photos show rust, discolored ceiling tiles, cracked pavement, buckling sheetrock, etc. KSD’s deferred maintenance fund balance is near zero and they aren’t adding to it from their ample regular annual tax revenues. Why is that?

      So they ask you to give them 25 years of maintenance money. If someone claims that “bonds are for facilities and parcel taxes are for teachers,” don’t buy that argument. Your regular taxes should be maintaining the facilities. The 2023 consultant study in fact concludes by urging an “annual contribution to a deferred maintenance budget.”

      Worse yet, that same study ends with this ominous warning that the study (and the bond it recommends) “does not include the need for replacement buildings and infrastructure that will soon approach.”

      Beware: Yet another big KSD bond is likely coming soon.

      KSD is addicted to bonds but has gone cold turkey on maintenance.

      Demand a top to bottom evaluation of the district’s fiscal priorities and capital maintenance.

      Vote NO on Measure E.

      LUCY DILWORTH
      2019-2020 Marin County Civil Grand Jury Foreperson, Attorney

      CHRISTOPHER GAYLORD
      Business Executive, District Resident

      HELEN M. ISAEFF
      Fixed Income Senior

      KARI S. ISAEFF
      Senior Caregiver Advocate

      DOREEN GLEASON
      Retired Business Owner, Long-time Kentfield Resident

    • ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE E

      Measure E is Too much money for way too little.

      • Measure E adds another $96,000,000 of new taxes to float a $48,000,000 bond. It funds what’s effectively a to-do list of deferred and future maintenance projects.
      • Bonds usually create something new of lasting value that benefits the future generations who pay for it, e.g., additional classrooms for a growing student body. Kentfield School District’s enrollment is falling.
      • Measure E’s project list includes repainting, refinishing bathrooms, asphalt, re-stuccoing, restriping parking lots, and roof repairs.

      Bonds on top of bonds and parcel taxes

      • Voters approved KSD’s $30,000,000 bond measure in 2014 and another $11,600,000 in 2004. They’re still on your tax bill.
      • Measure E adds to your taxes another $290 per $1,000,000 assessed value on top of $257 per $1,000,000 from the prior 2 bonds. Seniors and low income people are NOT exempt.
      • KSD’s 2024/5 parcel tax of nearly $1,800 is among California’s highest.
      • Tam Union High School District’s bond Measure B, on this same ballot, adds to the burden. It levies $170 per $1,000,000 assessed value.

      Laying off maintenance costs onto future generations to pay today’s high operating costs

      • Kentfield could not reach a contract settlement with labor unions in 2024. The budget’s too tight.
      • Voters rebuffed a higher parcel tax proposal in 2016.
      • Funding maintenance with multiple 30-year bonds appears to be their solution.
      • KSD ‘s tiny size is fiscally inefficient. For just 1,100 students, there’s a superintendent and a complete administrative staff.

      Transparency deficits

      • Measure E’s ballot 75-word ballot question doesn’t mention the tax’s $96,000,000 cost with interest, nor the 25-year term.
      • Seniors should be told there are no exemptions
      • Measure E flew under the radar, without meaningful community outreach before putting it on the ballot.
      • There’s no video of board meetings. The record is inscrutable.

      Demand more sound budgeting, transparency, affordability and community inclusion. Vote NO.

      COALITION OF SENSIBLE TAXPAYERS
      Mimi Willard, President

      KATHRYN GOLDSMITH
      Former President, Kent Woodlands Property Owners Association

      JULIA VIOLICH
      Financial Advisor for Safe Routes to School

      JOAN BENNETT
      Kent School & Redwood Graduate

      REIDE BAXTER
      VP, Greenbrae Management Inc.

    • REBUTTAL TO AGAINST MEASURE E

      The group against Measure E opposes virtually all investments in public schools. Six years ago, they opposed funding to prevent cuts to teachers and academic programs in Kentfield schools, yet our community said YES. Now, they want our aging classrooms to deteriorate, potentially compromising safety. Let’s band together once again, debunk misinformation and scare tactics, and do what’s right for our kids.

      What they unfairly characterize as a “to do list of maintenance projects” are critical repairs to protect student safety, support quality education, and allow our schools to function.

      Leaky roofs disrupt learning and need to be replaced. Deteriorating plumbing systems impact access to safe drinking water. Restrooms used by hundreds of students need renovation. Fencing improvements are essential for student safety. Aging solar systems need replacement to protect funding for instruction, while backup generators are essential to keep schools open during power outages.

      Over the past year, Kentfield School District worked with experts to carefully assess the needs at each school, developed plans for priority repairs, and shared information repeatedly at public meetings.

      It has been a decade since the last school improvement bond passed. Reports from the independent oversight committee confirm that funding from past bonds was spent as promised.

      Excellent local schools were one of the reasons many of us moved to Kentfield and we all benefit from quality local schools and the strong property values they support.

      Let’s continue Kentfield’s tradition of supporting our children and our schools by voting Yes on E.

      MARIA MARTIN
      Bacich School Principal, 19-year resident

      LAURA SCHMIDT
      Executive Director of Marin Enrichment, 45-year resident

      JEFFREY LEH
      Kent Woodlands Resident, Current KSD Parent

      ANN PECKENPAUGH BECKER
      Former President of Kent Woodlands Property Owners Association

      CHRISTINE DEVOTO
      Marin County Special Educator, 40-year Kentfield resident

    • FULL TEXT OF MEASURE E

      EXHIBIT B

      KENTFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT
      SAFE, WARM, AND DRY SCHOOLS MEASURE

      By approval of this measure by at least fifty-five percent (55%) of the registered voters voting thereon, the Kentfield School District (“District”) shall be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $48 million in aggregate principal amount to provide financing for the specific school facilities projects listed below in the Bond Project List, subject to all of the accountability safeguards specified herein.

      SECTION I: KEY FINDINGS

      • Kentfield School District (“District”) strives to provide every student with a high-quality, well-rounded education that prepares them for success in high school, college, and future careers.
      • While District teachers provide a high-quality education to local students, many classrooms and school facilities at Bacich Elementary School and Kent Middle School need repairs and upgrades to meet modern academic and safety standards, to ensure all schools provide a safe, warm and dry space to protect students and staff, and to provide modern classrooms that will attract and retain the best teachers and staff.
      • To identify specific facility needs at each school and to prioritize improvements based on urgency and importance, our District partnered with school facility experts to assess the condition of every classroom, lab and school facility in the District to identify needed repairs and improvements.
      • Based on this assessment, the District has determined that additional funds are needed to begin addressing the most urgent needs identified, such as:
        • Repairing and replacing failing roofs;
        • Repairing aging plumbing to maintain safe drinking water;
        • Renovating deteriorating student restrooms;
        • Improving campus fencing/ security systems to protect student safety; and
        • Upgrading electrical systems to support energy efficiency and school operations.
      • The state does not provide funding for facility improvements, so local schools cannot maintain modern facilities, infrastructure and technology without a local funding source.
      • The Board of Trustees believes that locally controlled funding from a school facilities improvement bond measure is needed to fund identified upgrades and repairs at local elementary schools.
      • Proceeds from a voter-approved school facilities improvement bond measure would be controlled locally for District schools only and could not be taken away by the State.
      • None of the money raised would be used for administrators’ salaries or pensions or other school operating expenses.
      • An independent citizens’ oversight committee, mandatory annual audits and public disclosure of all spending will help ensure funds are spent as intended.

      SECTION II: ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES

      The provisions in this section are included in this proposition in order that the voters and taxpayers of the District may be assured that their money will be spent to address specific facilities needs of the District, all in compliance with the requirements of Article XIII A, section 1(b)(3) of the State Constitution, and the Strict Accountability in Local School Construction Bonds Act of 2000 (codified at Section 15264 et seq. of the California Education Code).

      Evaluation of Needs. The Board of Trustees has evaluated the facilities needs of the District and has identified projects to finance from a local bond measure at this time. The Board of Trustees has certified that it has evaluated safety, class size reduction and information technology needs in developing the Bond Project List.

      Independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee. The Board of Trustees shall establish an independent Citizens’ Oversight Committee in accordance with Education Code sections 15278-15282 and applicable Board policy, to ensure bond proceeds are expended only for the school facilities projects listed in the Bond Project List. The committee shall be established within sixty (60) days of the date when the Board of Trustees enters the results of the election in its official minutes.

      Annual Performance Audit. The Board of Trustees shall conduct or cause to be conducted an annual, independent performance audit to ensure that the bond proceeds have been expended only on the school facilities projects described in the Bond Project List.

      Annual Financial Audit. The Board of Trustees shall conduct or cause to be conducted an annual, independent financial audit of the bond proceeds until all of those proceeds have been spent.

      Annual Report to Board. Upon approval of this measure and the sale of any bonds approved, the Board of Trustees shall take actions necessary to establish an account in which proceeds of the sale of bonds will be deposited. As long as any proceeds of the bonds remain unexpended, the Superintendent shall cause a report to be filed with the Board of Trustees no later than January 1 of each year, commencing on the first January 1 after bonds have been issued and proceeds spent, stating (1) the amount of bond proceeds received and expended in the past fiscal year, and (2) the status of any project funded or to be funded from bond proceeds. The report may be incorporated into the annual budget, annual financial report, or other appropriate routine report to the Board.

      SECTION III: BOND PROJECT LIST

      This Bond Project List, which is an integral part of this measure, describes the specific projects the District proposes to finance with proceeds of the bonds. All information contained within this “Section III: Bond Project List” comprises the Bond Project List and description of permissible projects and expenses that may be paid from bond proceeds.

      In order to meet all identified facility needs, the District intends to complete projects using a combination of funding sources, including joint use funds or contributions, development impact fees, and state funding (if available). The District will pursue state matching funds if and when they become available and, if received, they will be used for projects on the Bond Project List or other high priority capital outlay expenditures as permitted by law. Approval of this measure does not guarantee that all projects on this Bond Project List at all listed sites will be funded beyond the local revenues generated by this measure. The District’s proposal for the projects assumes the receipt of some state matching funds, which could be subject to appropriation by the Legislature or approval of a statewide bond measure. Bond funds may be used to meet any matching share contribution requirements.

      Proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized by this measure shall be used only for the construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, replacement, furnishing and equipping of school facilities, and the acquisition or lease of real property for school facilities, all as listed on the Bond Project List. All projects to be financed with bonds authorized by this measure listed on the Bond Project List have been determined by the District to be “school facilities” as that term is used in the California Constitution. “School facilities” include projects at school sites as well as administrative and teacher/staff support facilities which are necessary for, and related to, the delivery of high-quality education services. Unless specified otherwise, projects listed below may be completed at any property, school site or facility (including administrative/ancillary support facility) where such project is determined necessary, including the following schools:

      Bacich Elementary School
      Kent Middle School

      Specific projects to be funded by the bond measure include the following:

      • Repair or replace failing roofs
      • Repair or upgrade plumbing systems to maintain safe drinking water;
      • Improve campus fencing/ safety systems, including, without limitation, student safety fencing along McAllister Avenue and emergency communication across school campuses;
      • Renovate, repair and/or refinish or modernize deteriorating student restrooms;
      • Replace deteriorated classroom casework and flooring in selected areas;
      • Remove aging portable building at Kent Middle School;
      • Add new or replace failing cooling systems for IT network closets to prolong lifespan of information technology equipment;
      • Improve student/staff/driver safety and traffic circulation by upgrading school parking lots and access roads with new asphalt overlay and restriping campus parking lots;
      • Repaint and/or restucco campus exteriors to extend lifespan of weather resistant surfaces;
      • Replace and improve electrical systems and solar panels and install backup generators to prevent disruptions to learning.

      Listed projects, repairs, improvements, rehabilitation projects and upgrades will be completed only as needed, and the listing of projects does not imply a particular prioritization among such improvements. Projects may be done in phases, based on Board of Trustees priorities available funding. Listed projects may be completed at any and all District schools, sites, properties (owned, leased or yet to be acquired) and education buildings where such project is determined necessary. Decisions regarding the scope, timing, prioritization or other facets of project implementation will be made solely by the Board of Trustees by subsequent action. Where terms such as “renovate,” “upgrade,” “replace” and “improve” are used in the Bond Project List, the Board of Trustees has the discretion to determine the best method for accomplishing the project’s objective, including the use of new construction. For any listed project involving renovation or modernization of a building or the major portion of a building, the District may proceed with new replacement construction instead (including any necessary demolition), if the District determines that replacement and new construction is more practical than renovation, considering the building’s age, condition, expected remaining life, comparative cost and other relevant factors. In addition, where feasible, projects may be completed in partnership with other public or private agencies on a joint use basis using bond proceeds, subject to federal tax rules and regulations.

      Each project is assumed to include its share of costs of bond issuance, architectural, engineering, legal and similar planning costs; litigation costs; construction management; bond project consultants and District employee staff that administer the bond construction program; staff development and training expenses associated with learning construction techniques and approaches and new bond-funded equipment and systems; the furnishing and equipping of all projects, including, without limitation, equipment to maintain facilities in a safe and clean condition, and instructional equipment to improve student learning experience; and a customary contingency for unforeseen design and construction costs. Payment of the costs of preparation of facilities planning and project implementation studies, feasibility and assessment reviews, master planning, environmental studies, permit and inspection fees, Division of State Architect (DSA) - related requirements, studies and assessments, including ADA and seismic, and temporary housing and relocation costs for dislocated programs or activities caused or necessitated by projects on the Bond Project List, as well as hazardous materials abatement or management of other unforeseen conditions discovered or necessitated by construction projects, are permissible bond expenditures. Bond proceeds may be used to retire any interim funding incurred to advance fund projects described on the Bond Project List.

      The final cost of each project will be determined as plans are finalized and projects are completed. Based on the final costs of each project, certain of the projects described above may be delayed or may not be completed. Necessary site preparation, grading or restoration may occur in connection with acquisition of property, new construction, modernization, renovation or remodeling, or installation or removal of modular classrooms, including ingress and egress, removing, replacing or installing irrigation, utility lines, trees and landscaping, relocating fire access roads and acquiring any necessary easements, leases, licenses or rights of way to the property.

      SECTION IV: ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATIONS

      No Operating Expenses. Proceeds from the sale of Bonds authorized by this proposition shall be used only for the construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or replacement of school facilities on the Bond Project List, including the furnishing and equipping of said school facilities, or the acquisition or lease of real property for said school facilities, and not for any other purpose, including teacher or administrator salaries and other school operating expenses in accordance with applicable law.

      Single Purpose. All of the purposes enumerated in this proposition shall be united and voted upon as one single proposition, pursuant to Section 15100 of the California Education Code, and all the enumerated purposes shall constitute the specific single purpose of the bonds and proceeds of the bonds shall be spent only for such purpose.

      Other Terms of the Bonds. The bonds may be issued and sold in several series, and in accordance with a financing plan determined by the Board of Trustees pursuant to requirements of law. When sold, the bonds shall bear interest at an annual rate not exceeding the statutory maximum and with a maximum term not exceeding the statutory maximum, provided that the average useful life of bonds sold will not exceed one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the average life of the projects being financed or as otherwise provided by federal tax law. Bond funds may be used to reimburse the District for Bond Project list expenditures incurred prior to the election and bond issuance, in accordance with federal tax law.

      Attention of all voters is directed to the fact that the financial information contained in this measure is based upon the District’s projections and estimates only, which are not binding upon the District, nor are the summary or average payment estimates, if any, provided in the Ballot Label. The actual tax rates, debt service and the years in which they will apply may vary from those presently estimated, due to variations from these estimates in the timing of bond sales, the amount of bonds sold and market interest rates at the time of each sale, and actual assessed valuations over the term of repayment of the bonds. The dates of sale and the amount of bonds sold at any given time will be determined by the District based on need for construction funds and other factors. The actual interest rates at which the bonds will be sold will depend on the bond market at the time of each sale. Actual future assessed valuation will depend upon the amount and value of taxable property within the District as determined by the County Assessor in the annual assessment and the equalization process.

      In preparing this information, the District obtained reasonable and informed projections of assessed property valuations that took into consideration projections of assessed property valuations made by the County Assessor, if any, in accordance with Education Code Section 15100(c).

  • Measure K – City of Larkspur

    Shall the proposed ordinance, prohibiting residential real property rental rate increases for some rental units that exceed sixty percent of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index or three percent, whichever is lower, defining a base rent for affected units as the rent in effect on August 3, 2022, establishing a process for consideration of additional rent increases, limiting the grounds for evicting tenants of some rental units, enacting additional housing regulations, be adopted?

    YES                             NO

    Votes required to pass: Majority voter approval
    Initiative to limit rent increases for and evictions of tenants of some rental units

    • IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY CITY ATTORNEY OF MEASURE K

      CITY OF LARKSPUR

      MEASURE K

      Measure K was placed on the ballot as the result of an initiative petition signed by the required number of voters. It proposes to change current City of Larkspur (“City”) law related to rent increases for and evictions of tenants of some rental units.

      Measure K would limit annual rent increases for some rental units in the City of Larkspur to 60% of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index, not to exceed 3%. For tenancies that began before August 3, 2022, it attempts to set the base rent as the amount in effect on that date.

      It would create a process for tenants to apply to the City for rent decreases, including based on disallowed increases, decreases in housing services, or the physical condition of the rental unit. Landlords could apply for rent increases to ensure a reasonable return on investment. Applications would be decided by the City and could be appealed to the City Council.

      Measure K would limit the grounds for evicting tenants of some rental units. Grounds for eviction when a tenant is not at fault (“no fault”) include the landlord or a designated relative moving into the rental unit, or withdrawing the rental unit from the rental market, as well as temporary move out for substantial property renovation.

      A tenant displaced by a no-fault eviction would have a right to reoccupy if the rental unit was put back on the market, at the same lawful rent that the tenant paid previously. If the tenant declined to reoccupy, the base rent for a new tenant would be the same as the lawful rent that the displaced tenant paid.

      For no-fault evictions, a landlord would be required to make a relocation payment to the tenant household equal to four times the monthly fair market rent for the rental unit, or $8,000, whichever is more. If any member of a tenant household displaced by a no-fault eviction is 62 years of age or older, disabled, or terminally ill, the landlord would be required to make an additional $4,000 relocation payment.

      Some rental units would be exempt, including some accessory dwelling units and some owner-occupied. The limit on rent increases would not apply to rental units that received a certificate of occupancy after February 1, 1995, or to rental units fully owned, operated, and managed by a Marin County government unit, if the units are legally exempt.

      A ”Yes” vote is a vote to approve an ordinance that would amend current City law related to rent increases for and evictions of tenants of some rental units, as described above. A “No” vote is a vote to retain the current City limits on rent increases and evictions in Chapters 6.20 and 6.30 of the Larkspur Municipal Code. The ordinance would be approved if it received a simple majority of “Yes” votes.

      A report about Measure K is available at:

      https://www.ci.larkspur.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/19655/81-9212-Report-for-Initiative-on-Tenant-Protections (opens a new window).

      DATED: August 19, 2024

      s/SKY WOODRUFF
      City Attorney

    • ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE K

      Homeowners, renters, and mom-and-pop landlords agree: Vote Yes on K. We need real rent control in Larkspur.

      Larkspur rents have skyrocketed in recent years. The median rent now costs around $3,500 per month. About half of all Larkspur renters pay more than 30% of their income on rent and more than a quarter pay more than 50% of their income on rent.

      Let’s be clear: Astronomical rents are pushing Larkspur families, workers, and seniors out of their homes and out of our community. Measure K stabilizes out of control rents for thousands of Larkspur families while guaranteeing mom-and-pop landlords a fair return on their investment.

      Don’t believe the lies from corporate landlords who only care about protecting their profits. Measure K will not create any new taxes and is funded entirely by a modest per-unit fee of $7-$10 per month paid only by landlords. Large corporate landlords will pay more, while small mom-and-pop landlords will pay less than a monthly subscription to Netflix.

      In March, the city council passed exceptionally weak local rent control, capping annual rent increases at 7%, far more than Larkspur renters can afford. Under the current law, a $3,000 rent could rise to $4,200 in just five years and nearly double in ten years.

      We need real rent control in Larkspur that actually keeps families and seniors in their homes. Measure K will cap annual rent increases at 60% of inflation, making it sustainable for renters and fair for landlords. It prevents unfair evictions by requiring a “just cause” to evict, like failure to pay rent, a breach of lease, or an owner moving into the unit.

      Measure K is proudly endorsed by the Marin Democratic Party, the Sierra Club, and the North Bay Labor Council, who all agree: We need real rent control in Larkspur.

      www.Larkspur4RentControl.com (opens a new window)

      MARIN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
      Pat Johnstone, Chair

      SKYLARK TENANT ASSOCIATION
      Richard Quinones

      SIERRA CLUB MARIN GROUP
      Sam Ruben, Political Committee Chair

      NORTH BAY LABOR COUNCIL
      Jack Buckhorn, Executive Director

      CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS -MARIN COUNTY
      Kris Organ, Statewide CARA Board Member

    • REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE K

      Larkspur City Council members, including the Mayor, business owners, property owners, and renters agree: Measure K is bad for Larkspur.

      Measure K may decrease property values, limit City funds for fire, police and infrastructure projects, and undermine conservation goals.

      Measure K is not the solution for making housing more attainable. Even City Hall has acknowledged Measure K is “not an affordable housing policy.”

      In fact, Measure K could make housing less affordable; California’s nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office has stated rent control “does very little to address the underlying cause of California’s high housing costs: a housing shortage.” Measure K will not lower rents, create new affordable housing, or address homelessness. It could decrease housing and make prices skyrocket.

      Don’t be fooled by supporters of Measure K, some of whom don’t even reside in Marin County, and have no concern for Measure K’s impact on Larkspur. They’re pushing an outside agenda. Don’t believe when they say that Measure K is “funded entirely” by landlords – Measure K requires the City to front large sums to fund it, and landlords won’t reimburse lost tax revenue.

      Measure K is not only poorly written, complex and confusing, but so overexpansive that it intrudes on administrative functions of the City, according to City Hall.

      Larkspur already has tenant protections more restrictive than state law. That was the culmination of more than a year of community input, transparent policymaking, and a public vote. Measure K would upend all of that.

      Our community’s health, vitality, and future is in doubt with Measure K, given its extreme provisions and negative impacts on our community.

      Vote No on Measure K.

      www.NoOnK.vote (opens a new window)

      COALITION OF SENSIBLE TAXPAYERS
      Mimi Willard, Founder and President

      DENNIS GILARDI
      4th Generation Larkspur Resident & Larkspur Landlord

      MICHAEL SEXTON
      Director of Marin Residents

      RON ARLAS
      Former City of Larkspur Mayor

      STEPHANIE ANDRE
      Councilmember, City of Larkspur

    • ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE K

      Measure K claims to make housing more affordable, but even City Hall has deemed it’s “not an affordable housing policy.” Not only will the extreme control and costly regulations it proposes negatively impact housing affordability, it will have devastating effects on the Larkspur community.

      First, Measure K could make housing less affordable. California’s nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office (“LAO”) states that rent control “does very little to address the underlying cause of California’s high housing costs: a housing shortage.” The fact is, rent control does not lower rents, create a single new unit of affordable housing, or address homelessness. Even City Hall notes policies like Measure K could reduce existing housing units by reducing turnover, and that rental units are likely to be removed from the market should Measure K pass. Net result: diminished housing supply and skyrocketing prices.

      Second, Larkspur already has rent control. This policy was the culmination of community input, transparent policymaking, and a vote of the people. Measure K would upend all of that.

      Third, Measure K could cost the City of Larkspur up to $500,000 per year or more to administer, according to City Hall. In addition, City Hall anticipates that property owners will submit property tax appeals in response, further reducing funds for fire, police, public infrastructure, and schools.

      Fourth, the LAO has noted policies like Measure K may cause a decline in the quality of housing, thereby reducing property values. Given its extreme provisions, housing providers will have scarce resources to maintain buildings and it could deter interest in building new housing, given the significant investment required to build.

      Finally, Measure K undercuts environmental goals, like its restriction on a landlord’s ability to pass through actual utility costs to tenants. That means some tenants could use as much water as they want, with no consequences.

      The facts are clear: Measure K is not good for Larkspur.

      Vote No on Measure K.

      www.NoOnK.vote (opens a new window)

      MICHAEL BRISTOW
      President, Larkspur Chamber of Commerce

      SCOT CANDELL
      Mayor, City of Larkspur

      STEPHANIE ANDRE
      Council Member, City of Larkspur

      GLORIA AQUILINO
      Larkspur Property Owner

      JEROME BERNAL
      Larkspur Property Owner

    • REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE K

      Corporate landlords want you to think Measure K won’t keep rents fair and affordable.

      The truth is that Measure K will stabilize rents for thousands of Larkspur renters—roughly half of the city’s residents—by placing a reasonable limit on how much rents can go up each year.

      Corporate landlords want you to believe that stabilizing rents will somehow raise rents.

      The truth is that Measure K will lower rents over time for long-term tenants who would otherwise face outrageous rent increases of up to $500 per month, year after year.

      Corporate landlords want you to believe that Larkspur already has rent control.

      The truth is that Larkpur’s existing rent control law is extraordinarily weak, allowing massive rent hikes that threaten to force Larkspur families out of town.

      Corporate landlords want you to believe that the measure will be too expensive.

      The truth is that Measure K creates no new taxes on homeowners and is funded exclusively by a modest per-unit fee of $7-10 per month paid only by landlords.

      Corporate landlords want you to believe rent control will hurt property values.

      The truth is that rent control has existed for decades in nearby cities like San Francisco and Berkeley, where property values have continued to soar.

      The corporate landlords opposed to Measure K only care about maximizing their profits. Measure K is about keeping Larkspur fair and affordable for everyone. It’s about keeping our workers, seniors, and families in their homes and in our community.

      Don’t believe their lies. Vote Yes on Measure K.

      MARIN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY
      Pat Johnstone, Chair

      SKYLARK TENANT ASSOCIATION
      Richard Quinones

      SIERRA CLUB MARIN GROUP
      Sam Ruben, Political Committee Chair

      NORTH BAY LABOR COUNCIL
      Jack Buckhorn, Executive Director

      CALIFORNIA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS -MARIN COUNTY
      Kris Organ, Statewide CARA Board Member

    • FULL TEXT OF MEASURE K

      AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LARKSPUR REPEALING AND REPLACING LARKSPUR MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTERS 6.20 and 6.30.

      The People of Larkspur do hereby ordain as follows:

      Section 1. Amendment of Larkspur Municipal Code to Repeal and Replace Chapter 6.20 and 6.30.

      The Larkspur Municipal Code is hereby amended by deleting Chapter 6.20 and 6.30 and adopting in the place of Chapter 6.30 an Ordinance which shall read as follows:

      6.30.010 Title and Purpose.

      This Chapter shall be known as the Larkspur Rent Stabilization and Tenant Protections Ordinance. The purpose of this Chapter is to promote neighborhood and community stability, healthy housing, and affordability for renters in the City of Larkspur by controlling excessive rent increases and arbitrary evictions to the greatest extent allowable under California law, while ensuring landlords a fair and reasonable return on their investment.

      6.30.020 Findings.

      1. There is a shortage of decent, safe, affordable, and sanitary housing in the City of Larkspur.
      2. The prolonged affordable housing crisis in the City of Larkspur disproportionately impacts low income and working class households, senior citizens, people of color, immigrants, and people with disabilities, and increases homelessness and crime and harms neighborhood stability and cohesion.
      3. Residential tenants, who constitute more than 3,300 renter-occupied housing units in Larkspur, constituting approximately 54% of total City housing units, suffer great and serious hardship when forced to move from their homes.
      4. As of 2021, 84% of Black households and 67% of Latino households in Larkspur are renters, meaning that renters’ rights are a racial equity issue and strengthening tenant protections furthers fair housing.
      5. Additionally, approximately 53% of Larkspur householders over the age of 60 and 80% of Larkspur householders under the age of 35 are renters.
      6. State laws that eliminate limits on rent increases when a rental unit becomes vacant provide added economic incentive for landlords to evict tenants.
      7. An estimated 86% of all Larkspur housing units are in structures built before 1995, as identified by the U.S. Census Bureau, 2021: American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.
      8. Tenants should not consistently face the threat of losing their homes at no fault of their own. Common sense protections against unfair evictions are needed in Larkspur to protect long-time and low income residents from landlords who game the system to try to take advantage of high rents.
      9. According to American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau, approximately 49% of renter households in Larkspur are rent-burdened, which means that they pay more than 30% of their income on rent. Without rent stabilization, a tenant who moved into a unit they could afford can very quickly find themselves rent burdened.
      10. According to the same data source, approximately 26% of Larkspur renters were estimated to be severely rent-burdened, which is defined as spending more than 50% of household income on rent.
      11. Given the increased housing cost burden and poverty faced by many Larkspur residents, excessive rent increases threaten the public health, safety, and welfare of Larkspur residents, including seniors, people with disabilities, those on fixed incomes, those with very low, low, and moderate income levels, and those with other special needs. Such persons are often forced to choose between paying rent and providing food, clothing, and medical care for themselves and their families.
      12. The problem of rent increases in Larkspur has reached a crisis level, with rents consistently rising at rates higher than inflation and average wage growth, forcing people out of their homes and out of our community.
      13. The State Of California’s Tenant Protection Act of 2019 establishes an annual allowable rent increase of 5% plus inflation, far exceeding that of all municipal rent stabilization districts in the Bay Area.
      14. Without sufficient and long-term eviction protections, many tenants “self-evict” and move out even without adequate replacement housing, rather than face future legal eviction that could impact their ability to find new housing.
      15. Evictions can lead to homelessness. Unsheltered homelessness – the number of people living on the street, in tents or in vehicles – is increasing in Larkspur. Unsheltered homelessness increased 20% between February 2022 and March 2023. As of March 2023, 205 people were living on the streets, in tents, or in vehicles in Larkspur.
      16. According to the San Mateo County One Day Homelessness Count and Survey, the number of people living on the street, tents or in vehicles increased throughout San Mateo County by 21% between 2019 and 2022.
      17. Tenants in Larkspur have experienced significant displacement caused by a lack of legal protections against no-fault evictions. Without additional legal protections, such problems are expected to recur.
      18. Stabilizing rents and regulating evictions will protect existing affordable housing stock, enabling local residents to live where they work, thereby shortening commutes, improving traffic and air quality, and lowering local carbon emissions.
      19. The right to adequate housing is an internationally recognized human right, sanctioned by the United Nations and enumerated to include protection against forced evictions, security of tenure, and non-discriminatory access, as identified by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, The Right to Adequate Housing, Fact Sheet No. 21/Rev.1.
      20. In recent years, large, out-of-state corporate landlords have bought large apartment complexes in Larkspur and raised rents to the maximum allowed under state law—up to 10%—for the vast majority of tenants, for multiple consecutive years. Tenant organizers have faced retaliation through illegal eviction notices and landlords have refused to negotiate with tenant associations that represent a majority of tenants residing in their complexes.
      21. Larkspur’s largest apartment complex, home to over 600 Larkspur families, has begun raising rents to the maximum allowed under state law—up to 10%—for the vast majority of tenants.
      22. Construction and repairs on rental units or adjacent to such units can create hardships for tenants, especially those who are senior citizens, persons on fixed incomes and members of low and moderate-income households. However, both preventative maintenance as well as code enforcement-related maintenance sometimes involve the replacement or substantial modification of major building systems or the abatement of hazardous materials and, by their very nature, generally makes rental units temporarily untenantable, as defined by California Civil Code section 1941.1. Additionally, the State of California has passed several laws which have streamlined the ability of landlords to build on lots next to residential units that are already occupied by residential housing. These provisions have recently been extended to include not only units built in owner-occupied lots but also investment properties owned by developers who do not live in the community where they own property.
      23. In accordance with California Civil Code section 1946.2(g)(1)(B), the Council finds that this Chapter is more protective than the provisions of California Civil Code section 1946.2 for the following reasons:
        1. The just cause for termination of a residential tenancy under this Chapter is consistent with California Civil Code section 1946.2; and
        2. This Chapter further limits the reasons for termination of a residential tenancy, provides for higher relocation assistance amounts, and provides additional tenant protections that are not prohibited by any other provision of law.
      24. On August 3rd, 2022, the question of whether to adopt a rent stabilization ordinance in Larkspur first came before the Larkspur City Council as an agenda item.

      6.30.030 Applicability and Exemptions.

      1. Applicability of this Chapter. This Chapter applies to all residential Rental Units except for those units that are exempted.
      2. Exemptions from this Chapter. The following Rental Units are exempt from all provisions of this Chapter:
        1. Rental Units in hotels, motels, and inns which are rented primarily to transient guests for a period of fewer than thirty (30) days. This exemption does not apply:
          1. to a Tenant who has lived at the Property for more than thirty continuous days;
          2. to a Tenant who has entered into an agreement to lease a Rental Unit for 30 days or more; or
          3. where a Landlord has violated California Civil Code 1940.1 with regard to the Tenant.
        2. Rental Units in any hospital, convent, monastery, extended medical care facility, non-profit home for the aged, or dormitory as defined in California Building Code section 202 that is solely owned and operated by an accredited institution of higher education.
        3. A Rental Unit that has been the Primary Residence of the Landlord since the beginning of the tenancy, and where the Landlord shares a bathroom or kitchen with the Tenant. A Landlord, as used in Subsection 6.30.030(B)(3), means a natural person who has at least a fifty-one (51) percent recorded ownership interest in the Property.
        4. Any Rental Unit which is an Accessory Dwelling Unit or Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit lawfully permitted pursuant to Larkspur Municipal Code Chapter 18.23, so long as the Accessory Dwelling Unit or Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit is physically attached to an owner occupied single unit with separately alienable title.

      6.30.040 Exempted Only from Rent Stabilization.

      1. Rental Units exempt pursuant to the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act (California Civil Code sections 1954.50—1954.535) are exempt only from Section 6.30.060 and Section 6.30.160 of this Chapter (Rent Stabilization). If the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act is repealed or amended, by operation of law, new Rental Units shall be exempt per this Section 6.30.040(A) only for the first 10 years after the completion of their construction.
      2. Rental Units fully owned, operated, and managed by a Marin County government unit, agency or authority. This exemption applies only if applicable federal or state law or administrative regulation specifically exempt such units.

      6.30.050 Definitions.

      The following words or phrases as used in this Chapter shall have the following meanings:

      1. Annual Allowable Rent Increase. The percent by which a landlord may increase the Rent for any Controlled Rental Unit each year without an order from a hearing officer.
      2. City. The City of Larkspur.
      3. Controlled Rental Units. All Rental Units in the City of Larkspur except those units exempt as defined in Subsection 6.30.030(B) and Section 6.30.040.
      4. Council. The Larkspur City Council.
      5. Creditworthiness. Any standard for determining whether a Tenant is suitable to receive credit or reliable to pay money owed, including any financial or income standard created by a Landlord as part of a rental application.
      6. Disabled or Disability. As defined in California Government Code section 12955.3.
      7. Educator. Any person who works at a school in the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District or Tamalpais Union High School District as an employee of the school or of the governing body that has jurisdiction over the school, including, without limitation, all teachers, classroom aides, administrators, administrative staff, counselors, social workers, psychologists, school nurses, speech pathologists, custodians, security guards, cafeteria workers, community relations specialists, child welfare and attendance liaisons, and learning support consultants.
      8. Fair Market Rent. As determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for a unit of equivalent size in the San Francisco, CA HUD Metro FMR Area for the fiscal year in which the Rent is demanded.
      9. Housing Services. Amenities provided by the Landlord in connection with a tenancy. Housing Services include, but are not limited to, repairs, maintenance, painting, light, hot and cold water, electricity service, heating service, sewer service, elevator service, window shades and screens, storage, kitchen, bath and laundry facilities and privileges, janitor services, access to exterior doors, entry systems, and gates, refuse removal, furnishings, telephone, parking, the right to have a specified number of occupants or Tenants, the right to have pets, Utility infrastructure, and any other benefit, privilege or facility connected with the use or occupancy of any Rental Unit. Housing Services for a Rental Unit include a proportionate part of services provided to common facilities of the building where the Rental Unit is located. In addition, a Tenant's right to engage in Organizing Activities, to receive assistance from a Tenant Association, and to have Organizing Activities occur at the Property shall qualify as a housing service, and a landlord's failure to confer in good faith with a Tenant Association may support a petition for a substantial decrease in Housing Services.
      10. Landlord. An owner, lessor, sublessor or any other person entitled to receive Rent for the use and occupancy of any Rental Unit, or an agent, representative or successor of any of the foregoing.
      11. Maximum Allowable Rent. The maximum Rent which a Landlord may legally charge for any Controlled Rental Unit covered by this Chapter.
      12. Organizing Activities. Concerted activities by Tenants or individuals acting on behalf of Tenants for their shared collective interests as Tenants, regardless of whether they share the same Landlord or management company. Collective interests may include concerns regarding Housing Services, repairs and maintenance, security, rent amounts or rent increases, evictions, discrimination, or harassment. Organizing Activities shall include, but are not limited to:
        1. Engaging with other Tenants for the purpose of mutual aid and protection;
        2. Convening Tenant or Tenant Association meetings in an appropriate space accessible to Tenants under the terms of their Rental Agreement;
        3. Providing Property access to Tenant organizers, advocates, or representatives working with or on behalf of Tenants living at a Property;
        4. Distributing and posting literature informing other Tenants of their rights and of opportunities to involve themselves in their project in common areas, including lobby areas and bulletin boards, or communicating with other Tenants about their rights;
        5. Advocating for government action or legislation addressing issues of particular concern to Tenants;
        6. Initiating contact with other Tenants, including by conducting door-to-door surveys, to ascertain interest in and/or seek support for forming a Tenant Association;
        7. The operations of a Tenant Association, including joining or supporting a Tenant Association; or
        8. Otherwise acting on behalf of one or more Tenants in the building regarding issues of common interest or concern.
      13. Primary Residence. A housing unit that is an individual’s usual place of return. Occupancy of a Primary Residence does not require an individual to be physically present in the unit at all times or continuously.
        1. Factors that indicate Primary Residence include:
          1. The individual carries on basic living activities at the residence for extended periods;
          2. The residence is listed with other public agencies, including federal, state and local taxing authorities as the individual’s Primary Residence;
          3. Utilities are billed to and paid by the individual at the residence;
          4. A homeowner’s tax exemption for the individual has not been filed for a different property;
          5. The individual is not registered to vote at any other location;
          6. All or most of the individual’s personal possessions have been moved into the residence;
          7. The residence is the place the individual normally returns to as their home, exclusive of military service, hospitalization, vacation, family emergency, travel necessitated by employment or education, incarceration, or other reasonable temporary periods of absence;
          8. Other relevant factors illustrating Primary Residence.
        2. In order for a housing unit to qualify as a Primary Residence by a Landlord, ownership must be held by the natural person claiming Primary Residence and cannot be held by a limited liability corporation, limited partnership, or other corporate structure. A housing unit owned by a living trust may qualify as a Primary Residence if the trust beneficiary meets the above criteria, so long as the Landlord provides documentation to the Program of the name and address of all trust beneficiaries.
      14. Property. All Rental Units on a parcel or lot, including any associated common areas.
      15. Rent. All periodic payments and all nonmonetary consideration a Tenant pays in exchange for the use or occupancy of a Rental Unit and common areas, including all payment and consideration for Housing Services. Nonmonetary compensation includes the fair market value of goods, labor performed or services rendered to or for the benefit of the Landlord under a Rental Agreement.
      16. Rent Stabilization Program Administrator or “Program Administrator.” A person designated by the City to administer and oversee the Program.
      17. Rent Stabilization and Tenant Protections Program or “Program.” The City department that implements and enforces this Chapter.
      18. Rental Agreement. An agreement, oral, written or implied, between a Landlord and Tenant for use or occupancy of a Rental Unit and for Housing Services.
      19. Rental Housing Fee. The fee described in Subsection 6.30.150(D).
      20. Rental Unit. Any unit in any real property, rented or offered for rent for residential purposes, regardless of zoning or permitting status, together with all Housing Services connected with use or occupancy of the real property such as common areas and recreational facilities held out for use by a Tenant. A room or rooms rented separately from other rooms at the same real property shall constitute a single Rental Unit, even if Tenants share other common spaces or amenities.
      21. School Year. Either the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District orTamalpais Union High School District school year, starting with the first day of instruction for the Fall semester through two weeks after the last day of instruction for the Spring semester, as posted on the District website each year. For an Educator, the applicable School Year shall be for the District in which the Educator is employed at the time a notice of termination is served. For a child, the applicable School Year shall be for the Larkspur-Corte Madera School District if the child is in Pre-K through 8th grade and Tamalpais Union High School District if in High School.
      22. Tenant. A tenant, subtenant, lessee, sublessee or any other person entitled under the terms of a Rental Agreement to use or occupy a Rental Unit.
      23. Tenant Association. A group that has a primary purpose of addressing Housing Services and conditions, community life, landlord-tenant relations, and/or similar issues of common interest or concern among Tenants on the same Property or sharing the same Landlord, as provided for in Subsection 6.30.130(B).
      24. Tenant Household. All persons living together in one Rental Unit under one Rental Agreement.
      25. Utility. The provision of gas, heat, electricity, water, hot water, sewer, refuse removal, telephone, cable or internet.

      6.30.060 Rent Stabilization for Controlled Rental Units.

      1. No Landlord shall charge Rent or increase Rent for a Controlled Rental Unit to an amount greater than the Base Rent, as specified in Subsection 6.30.060(D) plus any lawful Rent increases allowed under this Chapter.
      2. A Landlord may set the initial Rent for a new tenancy to the extent permitted by state law. After that, a Landlord may only increase the Rent as allowed by this Chapter.
      3. Annual Allowable Rent Increase.
        1. A Landlord may increase the Rent each year by an amount equal to the Annual Allowable Rent Increase.
        2. The Annual Allowable Rent Increase shall be equal to sixty percent (60%) of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (All Urban Consumers, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward region as reported and published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or any successor designation of that index that may later be adopted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics) for the 12-month period ending as of April of the current year.
        3. The new Annual Allowable Rent Increase will take effect each year on September 1.
        4. In no event will the Annual Allowable Rent Increase be less than zero percent (0%) or greater than three percent (3%).
        5. The Program shall publicize the Annual Allowable Rent Increase amount each year by no later than August 1.
      4. Calculation of Base Rent.
        1. Initial rollback. Beginning the effective date of this Chapter, no Landlord shall charge more Rent for any Controlled Rental Unit than the Rent amount in effect on August 3, 2022 except for increases expressly allowed under this Chapter. For a tenancy that began before August 3, 2022, the Rent in effect on that date shall be the Base Rent.
        2. For tenancies beginning after August 3, 2022, the Base Rent is the initial rental rate in effect on the date the tenancy begins. As used in this Subsection 6.30.060(D)(2), the term “initial rental rate” means only the amount of Rent actually paid by the Tenant for the initial term of the tenancy.
      5. Utilities. A Landlord may not charge a Tenant for Utilities in addition to Rent. In order to be paid by a Tenant, the Utility service must be separately or individually metered and the Utility account must be registered to the Tenant and not the Landlord. This prohibition applies only to tenancies entered into after the effective date of this Chapter. It applies regardless of if the written lease allows for split utility charges or ratio utility billing services.

      6.30.070 Just Cause for Eviction Protections.

      1. Just Cause Required. No Landlord shall take action to terminate any tenancy unless the Landlord is able to prove the existence of one of the following at-fault or no-fault grounds in Sections 6.30.080 and 6.30.090. The grounds must be stated in the termination notice that the court action is based upon.
      2. Actions to which this Section 6.30.070 applies include, but are not limited to, making a demand for possession of a Rental Unit, threatening to terminate a tenancy verbally or in writing, serving any notice to quit or other eviction notice, bringing any court action to recover possession or be granted recovery of possession of a Rental Unit, including by seeking the entry of an eviction judgment, or by causing or permitting a writ of possession to be entered or executed.

      6.30.080 At-Fault Just Causes for Eviction.

      The following are the only at-fault just causes for which a Landlord may terminate a tenancy under this Chapter:

      1. Failure to Pay Rent. The Tenant failed to pay the Rent to which the Landlord is legally entitled under the Rental Agreement, this Chapter, federal, state, and any other local law.
        In any action to recover possession of a Rental Unit filed under this Subsection 6.30.080(A), it shall be a defense that the Landlord impeded the Tenant's effort to pay Rent by refusing to accept Rent that a third party paid on behalf of the Tenant or refusing to provide a W-9 form or other necessary documentation for the Tenant to receive rental assistance from a government agency, non-profit organization, or other third party.
      2. Breach of Lease. The Tenant has continued, after written notice to cease, to substantially violate any of the written material terms of the Rental Agreement, except the requirement to surrender possession on proper notice as required by law.
        1. To constitute a breach of lease, the substantially violated term must be reasonable and legal and have been accepted in writing by the Tenant as part of the Rental Agreement. Where such terms were accepted by the Tenant or made part of the Rental Agreement after the initial creation of the tenancy, the Landlord must have first notified the Tenant in writing that they need not accept such terms or agree to their being made part of the Rental Agreement.
        2. Before attempting to recover possession of a Rental Unit based on this Subsection 6.30.080(B), the Landlord shall serve the Tenant a written notice of the violation that provides the Tenant with a minimum of fourteen (14) days’ opportunity to cure the violation. The warning notice shall inform the tenant that a failure to cure may result in the initiation of eviction proceedings and include sufficient details of the violation to allow the tenant to reasonably comply and any information necessary to determine the date, time, place, witnesses present, and the circumstances concerning the reason for the notice. Any such warning notice must be attached to a notice terminating tenancy.
        3. Notwithstanding any lease provision to the contrary, a Landlord shall not take any action to terminate a tenancy based on a Tenant’s sublease of the Rental Unit if the Landlord has unreasonably withheld the right to sublease following a written request by the Tenant. The Tenant must continue to reside in the Rental Unit as their Primary Residence and the sublease must replace one or more departed Tenants under the Rental Agreement on a one-for-one basis.
          1. A Landlord’s refusal of a subtenant must state the reason for the refusal. If the Landlord fails to respond to the Tenant’s request to sublease in writing within fourteen (14) days of receipt of the Tenant’s request, the Tenant’s request shall be deemed approved by the Landlord.
          2. A Landlord's reasonable refusal of the Tenant's written request may not be based on the proposed occupant's lack of Creditworthiness, if the occupant will not be legally obligated to pay some or all of the Rent directly to the Landlord.
        4. Protections for Families. Notwithstanding any contrary provision in this Section 6.30.080(B), a Landlord shall not attempt to recover possession of a Rental Unit as a result of the addition to the Rental Unit of a Tenant's child, parent, grandchild, grandparent, brother or sister, or the spouse or domestic partner (as defined in California Family Code section 297) of such relatives, or as a result of the addition of the spouse or domestic partner of a Tenant, so long as the number of occupants does not exceed the maximum lawful number of occupants as determined under section 503(b) of the Uniform Housing Code as incorporated by California Health & Safety Code section 17922.
      3. Cause Substantial Damage to Unit. The Tenant has continued, after the Landlord has served the Tenant with a written notice to cease, to cause substantial damage to or expressly permit substantial damage to be caused to the Rental Unit and, after written notice, has refused to cease damaging the premises, or has refused to either make satisfactory correction or to pay the reasonable costs of repairing such damage over a reasonable period of time.
        Before attempting to recover possession of a Rental Unit based on this Subsection 6.30.080(C), the Landlord shall serve the Tenant a written notice of the violation that provides the Tenant with a minimum of fourteen (14) days’ opportunity to cure the violation. The warning notice shall inform the tenant that a failure to cure may result in the initiation of eviction proceedings and include sufficient details of the violation to allow the tenant to reasonably comply and any information necessary to determine the date, time, place, witnesses present, and the circumstances concerning the reason for the notice. Any such warning notice must be attached to a notice terminating tenancy.
      4. Nuisance. The Tenant has created a threat to the health or safety of other occupants of the Property or of the immediate area.The fact that a Tenant has been arrested or convicted of a crime, been the victim of a crime, or contacted the police or other emergency services, in and of itself, is not evidence of nuisance for purposes of this Subsection 6.30.080(D).
      5. Failure to Give Access. The Tenant has continued to refuse, after the Landlord has served the Tenant with a written notice, to grant the Landlord reasonable access to the Rental Unit for the purposes of showing the unit to a prospective purchaser or mortgagee or making necessary repairs or improvements required by the law. Unless necessary due to a documented emergency affecting a Tenant’s health and/or safety, all repair or improvement work will be scheduled in compliance with the Tenant Safety Plan and Section 6.30.010 and any applicable Program regulations.
        1. To terminate a tenancy under this Subsection 6.30.080(E), a Landlord:
          1. Must show that they provided written notice to the Tenant in compliance with California Civil Code section 1954 and all necessary repair or improvement work was scheduled in compliance with this Ordinance and all applicable Program regulations.
          2. Shall serve the Tenant a written notice of the violation that provides the Tenant with a minimum of fourteen (14) days’ opportunity to cure the violation. The warning notice shall inform the tenant that a failure to cure may result in the initiation of eviction proceedings and include sufficient details of the violation to allow the tenant to reasonably comply and any information necessary to determine the date, time, place, witnesses present, and the circumstances concerning the reason for the notice. Any such warning notice must be attached to a notice terminating tenancy.
        2. Tenants may request that workers, agents or any other people requesting access to their Rental Unit wear face masks and may deny access if such a request is refused.
      6. Return to Primary Residence. The Landlord seeks in good faith to recover possession of a separately alienable Rental Unit for their occupancy as a Primary Residence, after the Tenant failed to vacate upon proper notice. This shall apply only where the Landlord has previously occupied the Rental Unit as their Primary Residence and has the right to recover possession of the unit for their occupancy as a Primary Residence under an existing written Rental Agreement with the current Tenants for a term of no more than 12 consecutive months.
        1. The Tenant must be provided, at the inception of the tenancy, with a written statement that includes the length of the tenancy and that the tenancy may be terminated at the end of the temporary tenancy period with no further good cause.
        2. No relocation payment is required under this Subsection 6.30.080(F). However, if the Landlord fails to move in within 90 days of the Tenant vacating or re-rents the Rental Unit, any new Tenant moving into the Rental Unit will have as the original Base Rent the Rent in effect at the time the previous Tenant vacated.

      6.30.090 No-Fault Just Causes for Eviction.

      1. The following are the only no-fault just causes for which a Landlord may terminate a tenancy under this Chapter:
        1. Owner Move-In. The Landlord seeks to recover possession in good faith for use as a Primary Residence by the Landlord or the Landlord’s Designated Relative or by a professional caretaker who meets the requirements of Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1)(d).
          1. For purposes of this Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1), “Designated Relative” shall mean a Landlord’s spouse, domestic partner, child, parent or grandparent.
          2. A Landlord, as used in Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1), means a natural person who has at least a fifty-one (51) percent recorded ownership interest in the Property.
          3. The Landlord or Designated Relative or professional caretaker must intend in good faith to move into the Rental Unit within ninety (90) days after the Tenant vacates and to occupy the Rental Unit as a Primary Residence for at least thirty-six (36) consecutive months.
          4. Where a Landlord or their Designated Relative as listed in Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1) already lives at the Property and is over the age of 62 or Disabled, a professional caretaker of that Landlord or Designated Relative may additionally qualify as a valid person for whose use of the Rental Unit the Landlord may recover possession under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1). All other requirements under this Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1) shall continue to apply. If a professional caretaker who has moved into a Rental Unit under this Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1)(d) is subsequently charged Rent for the Rental Unit, it cannot be more than the previous Rent in effect at the time the previous Tenant vacated.
          5. Except as provided in Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1)(d), above, no eviction may take place under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1) if the same Landlord or the same Designated Relative already occupies a Rental Unit on the Property, or if a vacancy already exists at the Property. Only one specific unit per building may undergo an “Owner Move-in” eviction. Once a Landlord has successfully recovered possession of a Rental Unit pursuant to Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1), no other Landlords may recover possession of any other Rental Unit at the Property under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1). Any future evictions taking place at the same Property under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1) must be of that same Rental Unit. At all times, a Landlord may request a reasonable accommodation to the Program if the Landlord or enumerated relative is Disabled and a different unit is necessary to accommodate the person’s Disability.
          6. A Landlord who has terminated a tenancy for a Rental Unit under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1) may not terminate a tenancy for a Tenant who subsequently reoccupies a Rental Unit after termination of tenancy under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1) or relocates to a comparable Rental Unit on the same Property for a period of four years beginning from the date of the latest notice terminating tenancy.
          7. A notice terminating tenancy under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1) shall contain the name, address of Primary Residence, and relationship to the Landlord of the person intended to occupy the Rental Unit, a list of all real property owned by each intended future occupant, and the address of the real property, if any, on which each intended future occupant claims a homeowner's property tax exemption.
          8. If the Landlord, Designated Relative, or professional caretaker specified on the notice terminating tenancy fails to occupy the Rental Unit within 90 days after the Tenant vacates, the Landlord shall:
            1. Offer the Rental Unit to the Tenant who vacated it at the same Rent in effect at the time the Tenant vacated; and
            2. Pay to said Tenant all reasonable expenses incurred in moving to and from the Rental Unit, including lease termination fees. This Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1)(h)(ii) does not limit any other remedies a Tenant may have under this Chapter or applicable law.
            3. If the Landlord, Designated Relative, or professional caretaker specified on the notice fails to occupy the Rental Unit within 90 days after the Tenant vacates or does not occupy the Rental Unit as a Primary Residence for at least 36 months, the Landlord shall have the burden of producing evidence that the failure to occupy occurred in good faith.
          9. If the Landlord, Designated Relative, or professional caretaker specified on the notice terminating tenancy fails to occupy the Rental Unit within ninety days or fails to occupy for at least 36 months, and the previous Tenant declines to move back into the Rental Unit, any new Tenant moving into the Rental Unit will have as the original Base Rent the Rent in effect at the time the previous Tenant vacated.
          10. Eviction Protection for Elderly, Disabled, or Terminally Ill Tenants. A Landlord may not evict a Tenant under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1) if:
            1. The Tenant has resided in the Rental Unit for at least three (3) years and is either at least 62 years of age or Disabled; or
            2. The Tenant is certified as being terminally ill by the Tenant’s treating physician.
            For the purposes of this Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1)(j), notwithstanding the above, a Landlord may evict a Tenant who qualifies for the exemption because they are Disabled if the Landlord or designated relative who will occupy the Rental Unit is also Disabled and no other units are available at the Property. Likewise, a Landlord may evict a Tenant who qualifies for the exemption because they are terminally ill if the Landlord or designated relative who will occupy the Rental Unit is also terminally ill and no other units are available at the Property.
          11. School Year Protections for Educators and Students. It shall be a complete defense to an action to recover possession under this Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1) if:
            1. A child under the age of 18 or any Educator resides in the unit, the child or Educator is a Tenant in the unit or the child has a custodial or family relationship with a Tenant in the unit;
            2. The Tenant has resided in the unit for 12 months or more; and
            3. The expiration date of the notice of termination of tenancy falls during the School Year.
          12. A Landlord may not evict a Tenant under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(1) if there is a comparable Rental Unit at the Property occupied by a Tenant who moved onto the Property more recently than the Tenant from whom the Landlord seeks to recover possession.
        2. Withdrawal from Rental Market. The Landlord seeks in good faith to recover possession of all Rental Units on a parcel of land to permanently withdraw the units from the rental market or for demolition so long as the withdrawal is permitted by the Ellis Act (California Government Code section 7060 et seq.). The Landlord must have fulfilled all requirements of this Chapter and all regulations passed by the Program initiating the procedure for withdrawing Rental Units from rent or lease, with the intention of completing the withdrawal process and going out of the rental business or demolishing the Rental Units. Tenants shall be entitled to a minimum of 120-day notice of termination of tenancy. If a Tenant is at least 62 years of age or Disabled, the notice period shall be one year. Notice times may be increased by regulation if state law allows for additional time.
          The following shall apply to a unit where the Landlord recovers possession pursuant to Subsection
          1. Re-rental Within Two Years. If the Rental Unit is offered again for rent or lease for residential purposes within two years of the date the Rental Unit was withdrawn from rent or lease, the following shall apply:
            1. The Landlord of the Rental Unit shall be liable to any Tenant who was displaced from the Property by that action for actual and punitive damages. Any action by a Tenant pursuant to this paragraph shall be brought within three years of the withdrawal of the Rental Unit from rent or lease. However, nothing in this paragraph precludes a Tenant from pursuing any alternative remedy available under the law.
            2. The Program may institute a civil proceeding against the Landlord for punitive damages for displacement of Tenants. Any action pursuant to this paragraph shall be brought within three years of the withdrawal of the Rental Unit from rent or lease.
            3. Right to Reoccupy. The Landlord shall first offer the unit for rent or lease to the Tenant displaced from that unit by the withdrawal pursuant to this Chapter, if the Tenant has advised the Landlord in writing within 30 days of the displacement of the Tenant’s desire to consider an offer to renew the tenancy and has furnished the Landlord with an address to which that offer is to be directed. That Tenant or former Tenant may advise the Landlord at any time during the eligibility of a change of address to which an offer is to be directed.
            4. If the Tenant has advised the Landlord of a desire to consider an offer to renew the tenancy, then the Landlord shall offer to reinstate a Rental Agreement or lease on terms permitted by law to that displaced Tenant. This offer shall be deposited in the United States mail, by registered or certified mail with postage prepaid, addressed to the displaced Tenant at the address furnished to the Landlord as provided in this Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2)(a), and shall describe the terms of the offer. The displaced Tenant shall have 30 days from the deposit of the offer in the mail to accept the offer by personal delivery of that acceptance or by deposit of the acceptance in the United States mail by registered or certified mail with postage prepaid. The Tenant shall have the option to offer an email instead of an address to receive such offers. However, the email must be offered for this specific purpose to be considered offered.
          2. Re-rental of Rental Units Within Five Years. If the Rental Unit is offered again for rent or lease for residential purposes within five years of the date the Rental Unit was withdrawn from rent or lease, the Rental Unit shall be offered and rented or leased at the lawful Rent in effect at the time any notice of intent to withdraw the Rental Unit is filed with the Program, plus any lawful Annual Allowable Rent Increases. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply to all tenancies commenced during either of the following time periods:
            1. The five-year period after any notice of intent to withdraw the Rental Unit is filed with the Program, whether or not the notice of intent is rescinded or the withdrawal of the Rental Unit is completed pursuant to the notice of intent.
            2. The five-year period after the Rental Unit is withdrawn.
            This Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2)(b) shall prevail over any conflicting provision of law authorizing the Landlord to establish the rental rate upon the initial hiring of the Rental Unit.
          3. Re-rental Within Ten Years. A Landlord who offers a Rental Unit again for rent or lease within 10 years from the date on which it is withdrawn shall first offer the unit to the Tenant displaced from that unit by the withdrawal, if that Tenant requests the offer in writing within 30 days after the Landlord has notified the Program of an intention to offer the Rental Unit again for residential rent or lease. The Landlord of the Rental Unit shall be liable to any Tenant who was displaced by that action for failure to comply with this paragraph, for punitive damages in an amount which does not exceed the contract Rent for six months, and the payment of which shall not be construed to extinguish the Landlord’s obligation to comply with this Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2).
          4. Demolition Restrictions. If the Rental Unit(s) are demolished, and new Rental Unit(s) are constructed on the same Property, and offered for rent or lease within five years of the date the Rental Unit(s) were withdrawn from rent or lease, the newly constructed Rental Unit(s) shall be subject to the system of control established in Section 6.30.060 at which time they would be offered at the Rent that was paid at the time the prior tenancy was terminated under this Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2), notwithstanding any exemption from the system of controls for newly constructed Rental Units.
          5. Applicability to Successors in Interest. When a Landlord withdraws Rental Units from rent or lease pursuant to Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2), the requirements of Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2) shall apply to all successors in interest. The Program shall record a notice with the county recorder which shall specifically describe the real property where the Rental Unit is located, the dates applicable to the constraints and the name of the Landlord of record of the real property. The notice shall be indexed in the grantor-grantee index. The Program shall charge a fee for the processing of evictions filed pursuant to Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2).
          6. Notice of Withdrawal. A Landlord who seeks to demolish or withdraw a Rental Unit from the rental market under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2) must provide the Program with a notice, that states under the penalty of perjury:
            1. the number of Rental Units withdrawn;
            2. the address or location of those Rental Units;
            3. the name or names of the Tenants of the Rental Units;
            4. the lawful Rent applicable to each Rental Unit.
            The name or names of the Tenants, the Rent applicable to any residential Rental Unit, and the total number of Rental Units, is confidential information and for purposes of this Chapter shall be treated as confidential information for purposes of the Information Practices Act of 1977 Chapter 1 (commencing with section 1798) of Title 1.8 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the California Civil Code).
          7. The Landlord must record with the county recorder a memorandum summarizing the provisions, other than the confidential provisions, of the notice in a form which shall be prescribed by the regulation from the Program, and will require a certification with that notice that actions have been initiated as required by law to terminate any existing tenancies.
          8. The Landlord must notify the Program in writing of their intention to re-offer the Rental Unit for rent or lease.
          9. The date on which the Rental Unit is withdrawn from rent or lease for purposes of this Chapter is 120 days from the delivery in person or by first-class mail of the notice of withdrawal to the Program. However, if the Tenant is at least 62 years of age or Disabled, and has lived in their Rental Unit for at least one year prior to the date of delivery to the Program of the notice of intent to withdraw, then the date of withdrawal of the Rental Unit of that Tenant shall be extended to one year after the date of delivery of that notice to the Program, provided that the Tenant gives written notice of their entitlement to an extension to the Landlord within 60 days of the date of delivery to the Program of the notice of intent to withdraw.
          10. Protections During Extension of Tenancy for Elderly or Disabled Tenants. If a Tenant notifies a Landlord of their right to an extension pursuant to the previous Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2)(i) in writing within 60 days of the Program receiving the notice of intent to withdraw the Rental Unit, the following provisions shall apply:
            1. The tenancy shall be continued on the same terms and conditions as existed on the date of delivery to the Program of the notice of intent to withdraw, subject to any adjustments otherwise available under this Chapter.
            2. No party shall be relieved of the duty to perform any obligation under the lease or Rental Agreement.
            3. The Landlord may elect to extend the tenancy on any other Rental Unit within the rental property up to one year after date of delivery to the Program of the notice of intent to withdraw, subject to paragraphs (i) and (ii).
            4. Within 30 days of the notification by the Tenant to the Landlord of their entitlement to an extension, the Landlord shall give written notice to the Program of the claim that the Tenant is entitled to stay in their Rental Unit for one year after date of delivery to the Program of the notice of intent to withdraw.
            5. Within 90 days of the date of delivery to the Program of the notice of Intent to withdraw, the Landlord shall give written notice of the Landlord’s election to extend a tenancy under paragraph (iii) and the revised date of withdrawal to the Program and any Tenant whose tenancy is extended.
            6. The date of withdrawal for the Rental Unit as a whole, for purposes of calculating any time-periods in this Chapter, shall be the latest termination date among all Tenants within the Rental Unit, as stated in the notices required by paragraphs (iv) and (v). A Landlord’s further voluntary extension of a tenancy beyond the date stated in the notices required by paragraphs (iv) and (v) shall not extend the date of withdrawal.
          11. The Landlord must notify any Tenant displaced pursuant to Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2) of the following:
            1. That the Program has been notified pursuant to Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2)(f).
            2. That the notice to the Program specified the name and the amount of Rent paid by the Tenant as an occupant of the Rental Unit.
            3. The amount of Rent the Landlord specified in the notice to the Program.
            4. Notice to the Tenant of their rights under Section 6.30.090(A)(2)(a)(iii).
            5. That if the Tenant is at least 62 years of age or Disabled, and has lived in their Rental Unit for at least one year prior to the date of delivery to the Program of the notice of intent to withdraw, then tenancy shall be extended to one year after date of delivery to the Program of the notice of intent to withdraw, provided that the Tenant gives written notice of their entitlement to the Landlord within 60 days of date of delivery to the Program of the notice of intent to withdraw.
            6. That the extended tenancy shall be continued on the same terms and conditions as existed on date of delivery to the Program of the notice of intent to withdraw, subject to any adjustments otherwise available under Section 6.30.060.
            7. That no party shall be relieved of the duty to perform any obligation under the lease or Rental Agreement during the extended tenancy.
          12. Not later than the last day of the third and sixth calendar months following the month in which notice is given to the Program, and thereafter not later than December 31 of each calendar year for a period of five years, beginning with the year in which the six-month notice is given, the Landlord of any Property which contains or formerly contained one or more Rental Units which a Tenant or Tenants vacated pursuant to Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2) shall notify the Program, in writing, under penalty of perjury, for each such Rental Unit:
            1. Whether the unit has been demolished;
            2. If the unit has not been demolished, whether it is in use;
            3. If it is in use, whether it is in residential use;
            4. If it is in residential use, the date the tenancy began, the name of the Tenant(s), and the amount of Rent charged.
            If the Rental Unit has been demolished, and one or more new units constructed on the lot, the Landlord shall furnish the information required by items (ii), (iii) and (iv) for each new unit. The Program shall maintain a record of the notices received under this Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2)(l) for each Rental Unit withdrawn from the rental market pursuant to Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2).
          13. The Program shall notify each person who is reported as having become a Tenant in a vacated or new Rental Unit subject to the reporting requirements of Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2)(l) that it maintains the records described in Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2)(l), and that the Rent of the Rental Unit may be restricted pursuant to Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2).
          14. The Program shall maintain a register of all Rental Units withdrawn from rent or lease under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2) and the Rent applicable to each unit at the time of withdrawal. The Program shall inform Tenants displaced from units withdrawn from rent or lease at the address provided by the Tenant, when the Landlord notifies the Program that the Rental Unit or replacement unit will again be offered for rent or lease within ten years of the date of withdrawal.
          15. The Program may investigate whether a Rental Unit that was withdrawn from rent or lease has been again offered for rent or lease, and whether the Landlord has complied with the provisions of Subsection 6.30.090(A)(2).
        3. Temporarily Vacate for Substantial Renovation. The Landlord, after having obtained all necessary permits from the City and an approved Tenant Safety Plan on or before the date the notice of termination is given, seeks in good faith to perform Substantial Renovation to the Property.
          1. For purposes of this Subsection 6.30.090(A)(3), “Substantial Renovation” means repair or renovation work performed on a Rental Unit or on the building containing the Rental Unit that (1) brings the Rental Unit into compliance with applicable laws regarding building health and safety requirements by making substantial repairs, (2) cannot be performed while the Tenant lives there, and (3) that improves the property by prolonging its useful life or adding value. Substantial Renovation must additionally involve one of the following:
            1. Replacement or substantial modification of any structural, electrical, plumbing or mechanical system that requires a permit under the Larkspur Municipal Code.
            2. Abatement of hazardous materials, such as lead-based paint and asbestos, in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws.
            3. Repairs required by a Building Official in a Notice of Violation.
          2. Where the Landlord owns any other Rental Units in the City of Larkspur of the same number of bedrooms or fewer, and any such unit is vacant and available at the time of service of the written notice terminating the tenancy, or at any time thereafter until the earlier of the Tenant vacating the Rental Unit or a court of competent jurisdiction entering judgment awarding possession of the premises to the Landlord, the Landlord may notify the Tenant in writing of the existence and address of each such vacant Rental Unit and offer it to the Tenant as an alternative to providing the relocations payments required under Section 6.30.090(C), if the Tenant so chooses. In such case, the Landlord additionally shall offer the Tenant the right, at the Tenant's option, to enter into a Rental Agreement (to be designated as a "Temporary Rental Agreement") for the available Rental Unit which the Tenant may choose. The Rent for such a unit shall not exceed the lesser of the lawful Rent which may be charged for the available Rental Unit or the lawful Rent in effect at the original Rental Unit at the time of the notice of termination of tenancy. The Rental Agreement for the replacement Rental Unit shall be for a term of the lesser of ninety days or until the Substantial Renovation is completed on the Rental Unit vacated by the Tenant.
          3. A notice terminating tenancy under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(3) must include the following information:
            1. A statement informing Tenants of their right to relocation payments under this Chapter.
            2. The statement, "When the needed repairs are completed on your unit, the Landlord must offer you the opportunity to return to your unit with a Rental Agreement that has the same terms as your original one and with the same rent.”
            3. A description of the Substantial Renovation to be completed and the approximate expected duration of the Substantial Renovation.
          4. Where the Landlord recovers possession under Subsection 6.30.090(A)(3) either prior to or after an unlawful detainer judgment, the Tenant must be given the right of first refusal to re-occupy the unit. The Landlord shall notify the Tenant Household at least sixty (60) days in advance of the date the Rental Unit becomes available. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of the notice of availability, a Tenant Household must notify the Landlord if it wishes to reoccupy the Rental Unit. The Landlord must hold the Rental Unit vacant at no cost to the Tenant for sixty (60) days from the date the Tenant Household’s written notice of its intent to reoccupy the Rental Unit is received.
          5. School Year Protections for Educators and Students. If the expiration date of the notice of termination of tenancy falls during the School Year, the Landlord must make a showing that the Substantial Renovation cannot wait to be completed after the School Year. Otherwise, it shall be a defense to an action to recover possession under this Subsection 6.30.090(A)(3) that:
            1. A child under the age of 18 or any Educator lives in the unit, the child or Educator is a Tenant in the Rental Unit or the child has a custodial or family relationship with a Tenant in the Rental Unit;
            2. The Tenant has lived in the Rental Unit for 12 months or more; and
            3. The expiration date of the notice of termination of tenancy falls during the School Year.
      2. Right of Return and First Right of Refusal at the Same Rent. All Tenants that are displaced based on reasons under this Section 6.30.090(A) shall have the first right of refusal to return to a Rental Unit if it is ever returned to the rental market by the Landlord or a successor Landlord.
        1. The new Rental Agreement shall include the same terms as the original and the original Base Rent shall be the Rent lawfully paid by the Tenant at the time the Landlord gave notice for which the basis was listed in this Section 6.30.090.
        2. Should the Tenant decline to reoccupy the Rental Unit after it is returned to the rental market, the lawful Base Rent for the new tenancy shall be the Rent lawfully paid by the former Tenant at the time the Landlord served the termination notice, plus any lawful Annual Allowable Rent Increases.
      3. Relocation for No Fault Evictions.
        1. A Landlord seeking to recover possession under Subsections 42.9(A) must make a relocation payment to the Tenant Household. The amount of the relocation payment shall be equal to four times the monthly Fair Market Rent for the Rental Unit being vacated, per Tenant Household, or $8,000, whichever is more. The landlord shall pay this amount at the time of service of the notice of termination of tenancy. If the notice of termination is withdrawn, the Tenant shall return the relocation payment.
        2. If any Tenant of the Tenant Household is 62 years of age or older, Disabled, or terminally ill at the time a notice of intent to withdraw Rental Units under Subsection 6.30.090(A) is filed with the Program, the Tenant Household shall be entitled to receive a payment of $4,000 in addition to the payment required by Subsection 6.30.090(C)(1). A Tenant must notify the Landlord of their entitlement to this payment.
        3. When a Landlord disputes a Tenant Household’s eligibility to receive standard or additional relocation assistance, either party may file a petition with the Program requesting a hearing to determine eligibility. Such petitions and hearings shall follow all applicable procedures specified in Section 6.30.160 and Program regulations. This is not an exclusive remedy.
        4. Every year following the date of passage, both the minimum relocation payment provided for in Subsection 6.30.090(C)(1) and the additional relocation payment for provided for in Subsection 6.30.090(C)(2) shall adjust annually at the rate of increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Rent of Primary Residence in San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward for the preceding calendar year, as that data is made available by the United States Department of Labor and published by the Program.

      6.30.100 Tenant Safety Plans for Repairs, Construction, and Substantial Renovation of Occupied Rental Properties.

      1. Purpose. The purpose of this Section 6.30.100 is to facilitate investment by Landlords in renovations and the construction of new housing without subjecting tenants to either untenantable housing conditions during such renovation work or forced permanent displacement. A Tenant Safety Plan requires landlords to mitigate such temporary untenantable conditions, either through actions to ensure that Tenants can safely remain in place during construction, or through the temporary relocation of Tenants to alternative housing accommodations. These two options should not be regarded as mutually exclusive but rather as complementary approaches that may be appropriate for different stages of the renovation process.
      2. No Landlord shall perform repair, construction, or Substantial Renovation on an occupied Rental Unit, a building containing occupied Rental Units, or on the same lot as the occupied Rental Unit, which requires a permit or is performed in response to an order to abate from the City building official, without first obtaining an approval of a Tenant Safety Plan for such construction, renovations or repairs.
        1. Emergency Repair Exempted. In the event that a necessary repair must be completed in less than 48 hours to ensure the health and safety of a Tenant Household and no permit is required before work may commence, the work may commence without a Tenant Safety Plan.
        2. Substantial Renovation. For purposes of this Section 6.30.100, “Substantial Renovation” means work performed either on a Rental Unit or on the building containing the Rental Unit that brings the Rental Unit into compliance with the Housing Code by making substantial repairs and that cannot be made while the Tenant lives there, improves the property by prolonging its useful life or adding value, and involves either or both of the following:
          1. Replacement or substantial modification of any structural, electrical, plumbing or mechanical system that requires a permit under the Larkspur Municipal Code.
          2. Abatement of hazardous materials, such as lead-based paint and asbestos, in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws.
      3. The City (or Program, at the discretion of the City Manager) shall not approve a Landlord's application for a permit for repairs, construction, or Substantial Renovation unless both of the following conditions have been met:
        1. The Landlord has submitted a Tenant Safety Plan to the Program which, in accordance with this Section 6.30.100, the Program finds adequately mitigates the impact of the construction, renovation, or repairs upon affected Tenants; and
        2. The Landlord has submitted to the Program a declaration documenting that the Landlord served to affected Tenants both a Notice of Substantial Renovation and a copy of the non-confidential portions of the Tenant Safety Plan.
      4. Tenant Safety Plan Requirements. At a minimum, a Tenant Safety Plan shall provide the following information as well as any other information the Program deems necessary to ensure that the impact of the renovation upon affected Tenants is adequately mitigated:
        1. Identification of the Landlord, the general contractor responsible for the renovation, and any specialized contractor responsible for hazardous material abatement, including but not limited to lead-based paint and asbestos.
        2. Identification of all affected Tenants, including the current Rent each Tenant pays and the date of each Tenant's last Rent increase. In accordance with California Civil Code section 1798 et seq., information regarding Tenants shall be considered confidential.
        3. Description of the scope of work covered in the construction, repair or renovation. This description shall address the overall work to be performed on all affected Rental Units and common areas, the specific work to be undertaken on each affected Rental Unit, an estimate of the total project cost and time, and an estimate of the cost and time of renovation for each affected Rental Unit.
        4. Identification of the impact of the renovation on the habitability of affected Rental Units, including a discussion of impact severity and duration of noise, Utility interruption, exposure to hazardous materials, interruption of fire safety systems, inaccessibility of all or portions of each affected Rental Unit, other potential health hazards such as exposure to infectious diseases, and disruption of other Housing Services.
        5. Identification of the mitigation measures that will be adopted to ensure that Tenants are not required to occupy an untenantable dwelling, as defined in California Civil Code section 1941.1, outside of the hours of 8:00 am through 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, and are not exposed at any time to toxic or hazardous materials including, but not limited to, lead-based paint and asbestos. Such measures may include the adoption of work procedures that allow a Tenant to remain on-site and/or the temporary relocation of Tenants.
        6. Identification of the impact of the renovation on the personal property of affected Tenants, including work areas which must be cleared of furnishings and other Tenant property, and the exposure of Tenant property to theft or damage from hazards related to work or storage.
        7. Identification of the mitigation measures that will be adopted to secure and protect Tenant property from reasonably foreseeable damage or loss.
        8. Identification of a phone number and email address of a responsible party who will be responsive to tenant complaints about the execution of the Substantial Renovation.
      5. Tenant Safety Plan Acceptance. The Program shall make a determination of whether the Landlord's proposed Tenant Safety Plan is adequate within five working days of the date the Program receives the plan for review. The Program shall accept those plans which meet the requirements of this Section 6.30.100 and which it determines, with reference to the standards set forth in California Civil Code section 1941.1, applicable local codes, and in accordance with any regulations or guidelines adopted by the Program, will adequately mitigate the impacts of renovation upon Tenants.
        1. The Tenant Safety Plan may allow for the temporary disruption of major systems during the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, without requiring the relocation of Tenants in order to adequately mitigate the impacts upon the affected Tenants.
        2. The Program shall provide landlords with written indications of deficiencies which must be addressed whenever a Tenant Safety Plan is determined to be inadequate. A landlord may submit an amended plan in order to correct identified deficiencies.
        3. Once the Program has approved a Landlord’s proposed Tenant Safety Plan, the Landlord must provide impacted Tenants a copy of the approved Tenant Safety Plan along with a notice, as provided by the Program, of the Tenant’s right to appeal the Tenant Safety Plan pursuant to Subsection 6.30.100(E)(4).
        4. Landlords and Tenants may appeal the Program’s determination regarding a Tenant Safety Plan. The appeal shall be made in writing, upon appropriate forms provided by the Program, and shall specify the grounds for appeal, such as the plan being overly disruptive or that a temporary relocation should or should not be provided. The appeal shall be filed within 15 calendar days of the service of the Program's determination. The requested hearing shall be held within 30 calendar days of the filing of the appeal following the procedures adopted under this Chapter. The Program shall issue a written decision within ten calendar days of the hearing on the appeal, with a copy of the decision served on the landlord and the tenants by first class mail, postage prepaid, or in person. Such appeals and hearings shall follow all applicable procedures specified in Section 6.30.160 and Program regulations.
        5. Tenants may raise on appeal that job or childcare schedules or other unavoidable hardship require relocation or other mitigation measures beyond those proposed by the Landlord, in addition to the other requirements of this Section 6.30.100.
        6. Notwithstanding Subsection 6.30.100(E)(1), a Tenant Safety Plan shall not be approved if it would allow Tenants to be exposed at any time to toxic or hazardous materials, including, but not limited to, lead-based paint and asbestos.
      6. Substantial Renovation Notice. In the event that the work proposed is a Substantial Renovation, service of the approved Tenant Safety Plan items shall be provided in the manner prescribed by section 1162 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and at least 60 days prior to the date the Substantial Renovation is scheduled to begin. Notice of Substantial Renovation shall be written in the language in which the original lease was negotiated and shall provide the following information.
        1. The estimated start and completion dates of any Substantial Renovation associated with the accepted Tenant Safety Plan.
        2. A description of the Substantial Renovation to be performed and how it will impact that particular tenant or household.
        3. Whether temporary relocation will be required, and if so, a notice concerning Tenants’ rights under this Chapter.
        4. Instructions that Tenants with questions should consult the Landlord or the Program.
        5. Notice of the Tenant's right to reoccupy the units under the existing terms of tenancy upon completion of the Substantial Renovation.
        6. Notice that the Tenant may appeal the Program’s acceptance of a Tenant Safety Plan provided such request is submitted within 15 days of the tenant's receipt of the Notice of Substantial Renovation.
        7. Notice that a tenant can make complaints to the responsible party identified in the Tenant Safety Plan.
        8. A disclaimer in at least 24 point bold font on the first page of the notice stating “THIS IS NOT AN EVICTION NOTICE. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS CONCERNING YOUR RIGHTS AS A TENANT CALL [Phone Number of Program].
      7. Short-Term Tenant Relocation Plan.
        1. When a Tenant will be displaced from their Rental Unit for renovation, repairs, or construction work for a period of fewer than thirty days, the Tenant shall be immediately entitled to receive short-term relocation payments from the Landlord as set out in Subsection 6.30.10(G)(3). The Tenant may choose not to receive short-term relocation payments. If the Tenant receives short-term relocation payments, the Tenant remains obligated to pay to the Landlord the lawful Rent in effect when the Tenant vacates. If the Tenant has chosen not to receive short-term relocation payments, the Tenant shall not be obligated to pay any Rent until the Tenant reoccupies the Rental Unit.
        2. Should a Tenant be displaced for a greater time than originally notified, the Landlord shall pay additional short-term relocation expenses for each additional day of displacement, to be paid on a weekly basis prior to each additional week.
        3. The following amounts shall be paid by the Landlord to the Tenant for each day of displacement:
          1. Hotel or motel accommodations: $150.00 per Household;
          2. Meal expenses: $30.00 per occupant;
          The dollar amounts specified in this Subsection 6.30.100(G)(3) shall adjust annually at the rate of increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Rent of Primary Residence in San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward for the preceding calendar year, as that data is made available by the United States Department of Labor and published by the Program. The Program shall publish the new short-term relocation payment amounts each year following the increase.
        4. A Landlord’s failure to properly comply with the provisions of this Section 6.30.100 is not a defense to failing to provide relocation payments under this Subsection 6.30.100(G) or any available remedy.
      8. Nothing in this Section 6.30.100 shall prevent a Tenant from seeking a reasonable accommodation for Disability from a Landlord or impact a Tenant’s existing legal right to Disability accommodations during renovations.

      6.30.110 Provisions Applicable to All Eviction Actions.

      1. In any action to recover possession of a Rental Unit, a Landlord must allege and prove that the Landlord seeks to recover possession of the unit with good faith, honest intent, and with no ulterior motive, for the reason stated in the termination notice.
      2. If a Landlord claims the Rental Unit is exempt from this Chapter, the Landlord must allege in the notice of termination of tenancy and prove that the unit is covered by one of the exceptions enumerated in Subsection 6.30.030(B), including the specific grounds for the exemption. Failure to make such allegations in the notice shall be a complete defense to any unlawful detainer action.
      3. Additional Notice Requirements. In any notice purporting to terminate tenancy under this Chapter, the Landlord shall state the cause for the termination and any information required under this Chapter. All termination notices served under this Chapter must additionally include the following:
        1. A statement that information regarding the laws upon which the notice terminating tenancy is based is available from the Larkspur Rent Stabilization and Tenant Protections Program.
        2. A statement that Tenants seeking legal advice should consult with an attorney.
        3. The statement, “The Larkspur Fair and Affordable Housing Ordinance applies to your rental unit. Your landlord must have one of the reasons specified in the Ordinance in order to end your tenancy. Reasons that are not listed in the Ordinance, such as the sale of the property, are not valid causes for eviction under the Ordinance.”
        4. The calendar date on which the Tenant is required to vacate, including the month and day.
        5. All notices that the Landlord is otherwise required by this Chapter to serve on a Tenant during an effort to terminate a tenancy, which must be attached to the termination notice.
        6. Any other information that the Program may, by regulation, require.
      4. Filing of Termination Notices. The Landlord shall file with the Program a copy of any notice terminating tenancy within three (3) days after serving the notice on the Tenant.
      5. Failure to Strictly Comply in Eviction Actions. In any legal action brought to recover possession of a Rental Unit, the Landlord must allege and prove compliance with this Chapter. A Landlord’s failure to strictly comply with any requirement of this Chapter or any implementing regulation may be asserted by a Tenant as an affirmative defense in an action brought by the Landlord to recover possession of the Rental Unit.
      6. The requirements of this Section 6.30.110 shall apply to all notices terminating tenancy that have been served as of the effective date of this Chapter, but where the corresponding Rental Unit has not been vacated or an unlawful detainer judgment has not been issued as of the effective date of this Chapter.
      7. Good Faith in Eviction Actions. The Program may adopt regulations governing the determination of good faith.

      6.30.120 Buyout Offers and Agreements.

      1. Definitions. As used in this Section 6.30.120, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
        1. Buyout Agreement. An agreement in which a Landlord pays a Tenant money or other consideration to vacate a Rental Unit. An agreement to settle an unlawful detainer action pending in court does not constitute a "Buyout Agreement."
        2. Buyout Offer. An offer, written or oral, by a Landlord to pay a Tenant money or other consideration to vacate a Rental Unit. An offer to settle an unlawful detainer action pending in court does not constitute a "Buyout Offer."
      2. Disclosure Required. No less than ten days prior to making a Buyout Offer for a Rental Unit, the Landlord shall provide each Tenant in that Rental Unit a written disclosure, on a form developed and authorized by the Program, that includes the following:
        1. A statement that the Tenant has a right not to enter into a Buyout Agreement;
        2. A statement that the Tenant may choose to consult with an attorney before entering into a Buyout Agreement;
        3. A statement that the Tenant may rescind the Buyout Agreement for up to thirty days after it is fully executed;
        4. A statement that the Tenant may consult the Program with respect to the Buyout Agreement;
        5. Any other information required by the Program consistent with the purposes and provisions of this Section 6.30.120; and
        6. A space for each Tenant to sign and write the date the Landlord provided the Tenant with the disclosure.
      3. Every Buyout Agreement shall be in writing and include the following statements in bold letters in at least fourteen-point type in close proximity to the space reserved for the signature of the Tenant(s):
        “You may cancel this agreement in writing at any time before the thirtieth day after all parties have signed this agreement. You have a right not to enter into a buyout agreement. You may choose to consult with an attorney or the Larkspur Rent Stabilization and Tenant Protections Program before signing this agreement. The Larkspur Rent Stabilization and Tenant Protections Program may have information about other buyout agreements in your neighborhood.”
      4. A Buyout Agreement that does not satisfy all the requirements of this Section 6.30.120 shall not be effective and shall be void at the option of the affected Tenant(s). However any remedy based on an ineffective or void Buyout Agreement shall not include displacement of a subsequent Tenant or Tenants of the affected Rental Unit.
      5. Right to Rescind. A Tenant shall have the right to rescind a Buyout Agreement for up to thirty days after its execution by all parties, so long as the Tenant has not already permanently vacated the Rental Unit. In order to rescind a Buyout Agreement, the Tenant must hand-deliver, e-mail, or place in the U.S. mail a statement to the Landlord indicating that the Tenant has rescinded the Buyout Agreement no later than the 30th day after it is executed by all parties.
      6. The Landlord shall retain a copy of each signed disclosure form for five years, along with a record of the date the Landlord provided the disclosure to each Tenant, and shall give each Tenant a copy of the Buyout Agreement at the time the Tenant executes it.
      7. The Landlord shall provide a copy of the Buyout Agreement to the Program no sooner than the thirty-first day after the Buyout Agreement is executed by all parties, and no later than sixty days after the agreement is executed by all parties.
      8. Buyout Agreements must be maintained by the Program in a file that is separate from any other file.
      9. All information included in the Buyout Agreements by which an individual might reasonably be identified ("personally-identifying information"), including without limitation an individual’s name, phone number, unit number, or specific street address, must be maintained as confidential.
      10. The Program shall collect data from the filed Buyout Agreements--including, without limitation, the compensation paid as consideration for the Buyout Agreement and the neighborhood of the affected Rental Unit--and shall make that data public; but only to the extent that no personally identifying information is revealed.

      6.30.130 Right to Organize.

      1. Non-Interference In Organizing Activities. A Landlord may neither prohibit nor interfere with a Tenant, or a guest of the Tenant, from using common areas in that building to engage in Organizing Activities.
      2. Establishing a Tenant Association. Tenants on a Property may establish a Tenant Association by providing their Landlord a petition signed by Tenants representing at least 50% of the occupied Rental Units on the Property certifying that they desire to form a Tenant Association, and identifying the Tenant Association. For purposes of this Subsection 6.30.130(B) a "petition" may include individual written statements signed by said Tenants, or some combination of individual and collective written statements. For a Property with only one Rental Unit, the Tenants shall instead provide their Landlord a petition signed by 50% of the Tenants residing in the Unit.
      3. Requirement to Confer. Landlords and Tenant Associations shall confer with each other in good faith regarding Housing Services and rental conditions, landlord-tenant relations, Rent increases, and other issues of common interest or concern. In order to qualify as “good faith” for purposes of this Section 6.30.130, the parties shall have the mutual obligation, personally or through their authorized representatives, to meet and confer and continue for a reasonable period of time, in order to exchange freely information, opinions, and proposals, and to endeavor to reach agreement. Examples of conferring in good faith may include, but are not limited to:
        1. Maintaining a designated point of contact
        2. Engaging in regular communications
        3. Responding to reasonable requests for information
        4. Allowing participation by non-resident advocates
        5. Providing adequate time for limited-English speakers to obtain translation services
        6. Providing and adhering to timelines for addressing habitability concerns
        7. Negotiating and putting agreements into writing.
        The Program may by regulation prescribe additional guidelines and requirements for determining whether the parties are conferring in good faith.
      4. Right to Representation. A Landlord may not prohibit a Tenant from allowing a Tenant Association representative to attend any meeting or conversation involving the Landlord and one or more Tenants.
      5. A Landlord must on written request of a Tenant Association attend, either themselves or through their representative, at least one Tenant Association meeting per calendar quarter, though more frequent attendance at the request of the Tenant Association is permitted. A Landlord or Landlord's representative must·remain in attendance at the meeting until all agenda items are complete, unless the meeting extends for more than two hours, in which case the Landlord or Landlord's representative may withdraw from the meeting and request that the remaining items be continued to a subsequent meeting. The meetings shall occur at a mutually convenient time and place. To request that a Landlord or their representative attend a meeting, the Tenant Association shall send the Landlord a written request at least 14 days in advance; alternatively, if the Tenant Association meets at a regularly scheduled time and place, then the Tenant Association may send the Landlord a single standing request to attend meetings for the duration of the calendar year. A Tenant Association may send the Landlord a single standing request to attend meetings for the duration of the calendar year.

      6.30.140 Harassment Prohibited.

      1. No Landlord or such Landlord's agent, contractor, subcontractor, or employee shall do any of the following, in bad faith. For purposes of this Section 6.30.140, “bad faith” means willful, reckless, or grossly negligent conduct in disregard for legal requirements or in a manner indifferent to the rights of or impact on Tenants. The scope and effect of the conduct will be taken into account in determining whether the conduct is in bad faith. The Program may enact regulations to further guide the determination that conduct is in bad faith.
        1. Reduce, interrupt, terminate, or fail to provide Housing Services required by a Rental Agreement or by state, county or local housing health or safety laws, or threaten to do so. This includes the following:
          1. Curtailing any Utility services by any means whatsoever, including, but not limited to, the cutting or removal of wires, removal of fuses, switching of breakers, and non-payment of bills for Utilities that are part of the Housing Services.
          2. Impeding reasonable access to the Rental Unit.
          3. Removing doors or windows of the Rental Unit.
        2. Fail to perform repairs or maintenance required by a Rental Agreement or by state, county or local housing, health or safety laws, or threaten to do so.
        3. Fail to exercise due diligence in completing repairs or maintenance once undertaken or fail to follow appropriate industry repair containment or remediation protocols designed to minimize exposure to noise, dust, lead paint, mold, asbestos, or other building materials with potentially harmful health impacts, or fail to use all containment or remediation protocols designed to protect the health and safety of the occupants of Property when completing repairs and maintenance.
        4. Abuse the Landlord’s right of access into a Rental Unit as established and limited by California Civil Code section 1954 or successor statute, including the following:
          1. Failing to provide the approximate time of entry to a Tenant or providing a time window that is excessive relative to the amount of time for which the Landlord requires access.
          2. Entering or photographing portions of a Rental Unit that are beyond the scope of a lawful entry or inspection, including exceeding the scope of a notice provided per California Civil Code section 1954.
          3. Entering an excessive number of times.
          4. Entering in a way that improperly targets certain Tenants or is used to collect evidence against occupants or is beyond the scope of an otherwise lawful entry.
          5. Entering or demanding entry at times outside of normal business hours, unless for health and safety reasons or if the Tenant agrees otherwise.
          6. Entering contrary to a Tenant's reasonable request to change the date or time of entry.
          7. Misrepresenting the reasons for accessing a Rental Unit.
          8. Failing to notify a Tenant that a noticed entry has been canceled.
        5. Remove or threaten to remove from the Rental Unit personal property, furnishings, or other items that belong to the Tenant or that are part of the Housing Services without the prior written consent of the Tenant, except when done pursuant to the procedures set forth in California Civil Code section 1980 et seq., or successor statute.
        6. Influence or attempt to influence a Tenant to vacate a Rental Unit through fraud, intimidation, or coercion. This includes threatening to report a Tenant or other person known to the Landlord to be associated with the Tenant to any local, state, or federal agency based on their perceived or actual immigration status.
        7. Offer payments to a Tenant to vacate more than once in six months, after the Tenant has notified the Landlord in writing the Tenant does not desire to receive further offers of payments to vacate.
        8. Attempt to coerce a Tenant to vacate with offer(s) of payments to vacate that are accompanied with threats or intimidation.
        9. Threaten the Tenant, or their guests, by word or gesture, with physical harm.
        10. Interfere with a Tenant's right to quiet use and enjoyment of a Rental Unit as that right is defined by California law.
        11. Refuse to accept or acknowledge receipt of a Tenant's lawful Rent payment or rental assistance payment. This shall include a refusal to accept Rent paid on behalf of the tenant from a third party, or to timely provide a W-9 form or other necessary documentation for the Tenant to receive rental assistance from a government agency, non-profit organization, or other third party.
        12. Refuse to cash a Rent check or money order for more than 30 days.
        13. Interfere with a Tenant's right to privacy. This includes, but is not limited to the following:
          1. Recording video or audio that captures the interior of a Rental Unit.
          2. Unreasonable inquiry into a Tenant's relationship status or criminal history.
          3. Unreasonable restrictions on or inquiry into guests. Unreasonable restrictions on guests include, but are not limited to, prohibiting a Tenant from hosting overnight guests and charging a Tenant a fee for hosting overnight guests.
        14. Request information that violates a Tenant's right to privacy. This includes, but is not limited to, requesting information regarding the residency status, citizenship status, or social security number of any Tenant or member of the Tenant’s family or household member, occupant, or guest of any Tenant, except as required by law or, in the case of a social security number, for the purpose of obtaining information for the qualifications for a tenancy prior to the inception of a tenancy, or releasing such information except as required or authorized by law. This includes a refusal to accept equivalent alternatives to information or documentation that does not concern immigration or citizenship status, e.g. an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN). This Subsection 6.30.14(A)(14) applies to a prospective Tenant as well as to a current Tenant.
        15. Misrepresent to a Tenant that they are required to vacate a Rental Unit or otherwise entice a Tenant to vacate a Rental Unit through misrepresentations or concealment of material facts.
        16. Force a Tenant to vacate their Rental Unit and reregister to avoid classification as a Tenant under California Civil Code section 1940.1. Forced vacation can be implied from the totality of the circumstances.
        17. Unilaterally impose or require an existing Tenant to agree to material new terms of tenancy or to a new Rental Agreement, unless:
          1. The change in the terms of tenancy is authorized by California Civil Code sections 1946.2(f), 1947.5, or 1947.12, or successor statutes, or is required by federal, state, or local law or regulatory agreement with a government agency, or
          2. The change in the terms of the tenancy was accepted in writing by the Tenant after receipt of written notice from the Landlord that the Tenant need not accept such new terms as part of the Rental Agreement.
          Notwithstanding Subsections 42.14(A)(17)(a) and (b), for Controlled Rental Units, all changes in terms of tenancy must additionally comply with the provisions of this Chapter and any accompanying regulations.
        18. Remove a Housing Service for the purpose of causing the Tenant to vacate the Rental Unit.
        19. Commit elder financial abuse, as defined by California Welfare and Institutions Code 15610.30 et seq., of a Tenant.
        20. Fail to provide or fail to adequately provide Housing Services to a Tenant that are customarily provided to other Tenants in the building who pay a different Rent amount or use a different source of income to pay Rent.
        21. Fail to provide or fail to adequately provide Housing Services to a Tenant that are customarily provided to other Tenants in the building when the Tenant owes COVID-19 rental debt. For purposes of this Subsection 6.30.140(A)(21), “COVID-19 rental debt” shall mean unpaid rent or any other unpaid financial obligation under the Rental Agreement that came due between March 1, 2020 and February 28, 2023.
        22. Release information protected by the Tenant's right to privacy except as required or authorized by law.
        23. Conduct elective renovation of or construction work on a Rental Unit for the purpose of harassing a Tenant.
        24. Provide false written or verbal information regarding any federal, state, county, or local Tenant protections, including mischaracterizing the nature or effect of a notice to quit or other eviction notice. False information includes, without limitation, requesting or demanding a Tenant:
          1. Sign a new Rental Agreement not in the Tenant's primary language if:
            1. Rental Agreement negotiations were conducted in the Tenant's primary language;
            2. The existing Rental Agreement is in the Tenant's primary language; or
            3. The Landlord is otherwise aware that the new Rental Agreement is not in Tenant's primary language.
          2. Enter into a Rent repayment plan if the Landlord states, misrepresents, suggests, or implies, that the Tenant should or must do so to take advantage of Tenant protection laws that do not in fact require such plans.
        25. Communicate with the Tenant in a language other than the Tenant's primary language for the purpose of intimidating, confusing, deceiving or annoying the Tenant.
        26. Interfere with the right of Tenants to engage in Organizing Activities.
        27. Engage any Tenant in any form of human trafficking as defined by California Penal Code section 236.1, as a condition of that Tenant’s continued occupancy of a Rental Unit.
        28. Other repeated acts or omissions of such significance as to substantially interfere with or disturb the comfort, peace or quiet of any person lawfully entitled to occupancy of such Rental Unit and that cause, are likely to cause, or are intended to cause any person lawfully entitled to occupancy of a Rental Unit to vacate such Rental Unit or to surrender or waive any rights in relation to such occupancy.
        The Program may, by regulation, augment but not eliminate, reduce or weaken this list.
      2. Severances Prohibited. The following amenities, supplied in connection with use or occupancy of a Rental Unit, may not be severed from a tenancy without good cause: garage facilities, parking facilities, driveways, storage spaces, laundry rooms, decks, patios, backyards, gardens on the same lot, kitchen facilities, toilet facilities, or lobbies in residential hotels. For purposes of this Section 6.30.140, good cause shall include:
        1. The requirement of federal, state, or local law;
        2. For Rental Units which are not Controlled Rental Units, acceptance of the severance in writing by the Tenant after receipt of written notice from the Landlord that the Tenant need not accept the severance;
        3. For Controlled Rental Units, Program approval of the removal of amenities in a manner consistent with the Program’s regulations; or
        4. The removal of a balcony for which repair or removal was necessary for safety and where the Landlord has obtained all necessary permits for the removal.
        A severance does not include noticed temporary unavailability of the above Housing Services to perform necessary work with all required permits.

      6.30.150 Rent Stabilization and Tenant Protections Program and Funding.

      1. Powers and Duties. The Program shall have the following powers, duties, and responsibilities:
        1. Establish a Base Rent under Subsection 6.30.060(A).
        2. Make Rent increases and decreases in accordance with Section 6.30.160.
        3. Issue orders, rules and regulations, conduct hearings and charge and collect fees as set forth below.
        4. Make such studies, surveys and investigations, conduct such hearings, and obtain such information as is necessary to carry out its powers and duties.
        5. Report annually to the Council on the status of rental housing covered by this Chapter.
        6. Maintain a database of unlawful detainer filings, and termination, rent increase, and change in terms of notices received by the Program.
        7. Administer oaths and affirmations and subpoena witnesses.
        8. Establish rules and regulations for deducting penalties and settling civil claims regarding the Rental Housing Fee.
        9. Seek injunctive and other civil relief under this Chapter.
        10. Charge and collect the Rental Housing Fee, including penalties for late payments.
        11. Make available on a contract basis legal services for low income residents of the City related to presentation in evictions, petitions, hearings and administrative appeals.
        12. Collect and/or receive copies of notices of termination of tenancy, unlawful detainer complaints, Rent increase, and changes in terms of tenancy.
        13. Any other duties necessary to administer and enforce this Chapter.
      2. Rules and Regulations. The Program shall issue such rules and regulations as will further the purposes of the Chapter. The Program shall publicize its rules and regulations prior to promulgation on its website and any other appropriate medium. All rules and regulations, internal staff memoranda, and written correspondence explaining the decisions, orders, and policies of the Program shall be kept in the Program's office and made available online to the public for inspection, download and copying or any other future appropriate technology.
      3. Community Education.
        1. The Program shall publicize this Chapter so that all residents of Larkspur will have the opportunity to become informed about their legal rights and duties under this Chapter. The Program shall prepare a brochure which fully describes the legal rights and duties of Landlords and Tenants under this Chapter. The brochure will be available to the public and each Tenant of a Rental Unit shall receive a copy of the brochure from their Landlord. Landlords shall provide the brochure at the commencement of the tenancy and with each notice of Rent increase, and to all sitting Tenants when the brochure is first made available by the Program. This brochure will be made available for download from the City website and/or other appropriate technology. Information about the Chapter shall be made available in all other languages that are requested by the community.
        2. The Program shall produce materials describing a Tenant’s rights under the Ordinance for posting in common areas. If Rental Units subject to this Chapter are located on a Property with an interior common area that all Tenants have access to, the Landlord must post the materials as provided and specified by the Program in at least one such common area on the Property.
      4. Rental Housing Fee.
        1. The Council shall finance the reasonable and necessary expenses of the Program by charging Landlords an annual Rental Housing Fee. The Council shall ensure that the Rental Housing Fee is set at a level sufficient to fund the duties and responsibilities of the Program, including but not limited to the provision of legal services as set out under Subsection 6.30.150(A)(12).
        2. The Rental Housing Fee amount will be determined by the Council after the Program provides a recommendation to the Council. The Program and staff to enforce this Chapter shall be funded only by the Rental Housing Fee and not from the General Fund. However, the City shall front any necessary funds until the City has collected such fees.
        3. From the time that this Chapter goes into effect until the Rental Housing Fee is determined, the amount shall be $120 per Controlled Rental Unit per year ($10 per month) and $84 per unit ($7 per month) for Units that are partially exempt under Section 6.30.040 only and are not Controlled Rental Units.
        4. The Rental Housing Fee shall become due at the start of a new tenancy if no Rental Housing Fee was paid the prior year. Ongoing tenancies shall have Rental Housing Fees collected in January of each year or at the same time as the City business license fee each year. The fee shall not be deemed late and no penalty shall be imposed unless received by the Program 30 days or more after the due date.
        5. The Rental Housing Fee shall be deposited into a Rent Stabilization and Tenant Protections Program Fund, the sole and exclusive purpose for which shall be the funding of the Program and the administration, enforcement, and enactment of this Chapter.
      5. Personnel. The Council shall review and assess yearly that a sufficient number of staff are employed by the Program, such as a Program Administrator, hearing examiners, housing counselors and legal services, as may be necessary to perform the functions of the Program efficiently in order to fulfill the purpose of this Chapter.
      6. Reporting and Fee Payment Requirements.
        1. Within sixty (60) days after the adoption of this Chapter, all Landlords shall be required to provide a copy of all Rent increase notices, change of terms of tenancy and tenancy termination notices with the Program within 3 days after serving said notice on a Tenant. A proof of service with time and date of service of notice on Tenant shall be included with any notice filed with the City.
        2. If the Program, after the Landlord has proper notice and after a hearing, determines that a Landlord has willfully and knowingly failed to properly report, as described above, any Rent increase notices, change of terms of tenancy or tenancy termination, or to pay the Rental Housing Fee, the Program may authorize the Tenant of such a Rental Unit to withhold all or a portion of the Rent for the Rental Unit until such time as the Rental Housing Fee is paid or notice filed. After a notice is properly filed or fee paid, the Program shall determine what portion, if any, of the withheld Rent is owed to the Landlord for the period in which the notice is not properly filed or fee paid. Whether or not the Program allows such withholding, no Landlord who has failed to properly report or pay the fee shall at any time increase Rents for a Controlled Rental Unit until such fee or notice is reported. This shall take effect thirty (30) days after determination of the Program.
        3. Failing to pay the fee or comply with Subsection 6.30.150(F)(1), before the filing of an unlawful detainer lawsuit, is a complete defense to an unlawful detainer. No Program action is required for this defense to be alleged or litigated in an unlawful detainer action.

      6.30.160 Rent Stabilization Petition and Hearing Process.

      1. Petitions to Raise or Decrease Rents. A Landlord or a Tenant may file a petition with the Program to increase or decrease the Maximum Allowable Rent of a Rental Unit for a reason outlined in this Chapter.
        1. Petition Procedures. The petition shall be filed on the form provided by the Program. A petition filed by a Landlord shall include a declaration by the Landlord that the Rental Unit meets all requirements of this Chapter. The Program may refuse to hold a hearing and/or grant a Rent adjustment if an individual hearing has been held and decision made regarding Maximum Allowable Rent for the Rental Unit within the previous twelve (12) months.
        2. Procedures for Rent Adjustment. After a petition is filed, a hearing examiner may adjust the Maximum Allowable Rent of an individual Controlled Rental Unit upward or downward per the requirements of this Chapter. In making adjustments, the hearing examiner shall consider the purposes of this Chapter and the requirements of law, including state law.
      2. Downward Adjustments. In making an individual downward adjustment, the Program may consider prior or current unlawful increases, decreases in Housing Services; substantial deterioration of the Controlled Rental Unit other than as a result of ordinary wear and tear; or failure on the part of the Landlord to provide adequate Housing Services or to comply substantially with applicable housing, health and safety codes.
      3. Upward Adjustments - Right of Reasonable Return for Landlords.
        1. Landlords have the right to a reasonable return on their investment. A hearing examiner shall make an upward adjustment of the Maximum Allowable Rent if a Landlord demonstrates that the such adjustments are necessary to provide a reasonable return. The Program may create regulations to govern petitions filed under this Subsection 6.30.160(C) in accordance with this Chapter and the law.
        2. Factors to be considered. In making such upward adjustments of the Maximum Allowable Rent, the hearing examiner shall consider the purposes of this Chapter and shall specifically consider all relevant factors, including (but not limited to):
          1. Increases or decreases in property taxes;
          2. Unavoidable increases or any decreases in maintenance and operating expenses;
          3. The cost of planned or completed capital improvements to the Rental Unit (as distinguished from ordinary repair, replacement and maintenance) where such capital improvements are necessary to bring the Property into compliance or maintain compliance with applicable local code requirements affecting health and safety, and where such capital improvement costs are properly amortized over the life of the improvement;
          4. Increases or decreases in the number of Tenants occupying the Rental Unit, living space, furniture, furnishings, equipment, or other Housing Services provided, or occupancy rules;
          5. Substantial deterioration of the Rental Unit other than as a result of normal wear and tear;
          6. Failure on the part of the Landlord to provide adequate Housing Services, or to comply substantially with applicable state rental housing laws, local housing, health and safety codes, or the Rental Agreement;
          7. Whether parties conferred in good faith relating to Housing Services and conditions, landlord-tenant relations, rent increases, and other issues of common interest or concern;
          8. The pattern of recent Rent increases or decreases;
          9. The Landlord’s rate of return on investment. In determining such return, all relevant factors, including but not limited to the following shall be considered: the Landlord’s actual cash down payment, method of financing the property, and any federal or state tax benefits accruing to the Landlord as a result of ownership of the property; and
          10. Whether or not the property was acquired or is held as a long-term or short-term investment.
        3. Additional limits on the total increase per month and length of monthly increases shall be added by the Program through regulations.
        4. The Program shall not authorize an upward adjustment of an individual Maximum Allowable Rent if the Landlord:
          1. has continued to fail to comply, after order of the Program, with any provisions of this Chapter and/or orders or regulations issued thereunder by the Program, or
          2. has failed to bring the Rental Unit into compliance with the implied warranty of habitability.
      4. Effective Date of Adjustment. If the Program approves an increase in the Maximum Allowable Rent, the increase shall become effective only after the Landlord gives the Tenant at least a thirty (30) day written notice of the Rent increase and the notice period expires. If the Program approves a downward adjustment of the Maximum Allowable Rent, the Rent decrease shall take effect no sooner than thirty (30) days after the date both parties are sent notice of the downward adjustment and its effective date by the Program.
      5. Hearing Procedure. The Program shall enact rules and regulations for hearings and appeals which shall include the following:
        1. Hearing Examiner. A hearing examiner designated by the Program shall conduct a hearing to act upon the petition for individual adjustment of Maximum Allowable Rent and shall have the power to administer oaths and affirmations.
        2. Notice. Once it receives a petition, the Program shall notify the other party and provide a copy thereof.
        3. Time of Hearing. The hearing officer shall notify all parties of the time, date and place of the hearing.
        4. Records. The hearing examiner may require either party to a hearing to provide it any records and papers deemed pertinent in addition to the information in registration statements for the Rental Unit. If the hearing examiner finds good cause to believe the Program's information does not reflect the current condition of the Controlled Rental Unit, the hearing examiner shall conduct a current building inspection and/or request that the City conduct a current building inspection. The Tenant may request that the hearing examiner order such an inspection on or prior to the date of the hearing. All documents required under this Subsection 6.30.160(E)(4) shall be made available to the parties at the Program office prior to the hearing. In cases where information filed in a petition or in additional submissions filed at the request of the hearing examiner is inadequate or false, no action shall be taken on the petition until the deficiency is remedied.
        5. Open Hearings. All Maximum Allowable Rent adjustment hearings shall be open to the public.
        6. Right of Assistance. All parties to a hearing may have assistance in presenting evidence and developing their position from attorneys, legal workers, Tenant Association representatives or any other persons designated by the parties.
        7. Hearing Record. The Program shall make an official record of the hearing, including the recording, available for inspection and copying by any person. This shall constitute the exclusive record for decision on the issues of the hearing. The record of the hearing shall include all exhibits, papers and documents required to be filed or offered or accepted into evidence during the proceedings; a list of participants present; a summary of all testimony accepted in the proceedings; a statement of all materials officially noticed; all recommended decisions, orders and/or rulings; all final decisions, orders and/or rulings, and the reasons for each final decision, order and/or ruling. All hearings shall be recorded. Any party may receive a copy of the audio recording. Reasonable costs may be charged for a recording copy. The Program shall not be responsible for transcribing the audio recording.
        8. Standard of Proof and Notice of Decision. A hearing office shall not grant an individual adjustment unless the adjustment is supported by the preponderance of the evidence submitted at the hearing. All parties to a hearing shall be sent a notice of the decision and a copy of the findings of fact and law upon which the decision is based. The parties to the proceeding shall also be notified in the decision of their right to any appeal allowed by the Program and/or to judicial review of the decision pursuant to this Section 6.30.160.
        9. Consolidation. All Landlord petitions pertaining to Tenants of the same Property shall be consolidated for hearing. All petitions filed by Tenants occupying the same Property shall be consolidated for hearing unless there is a showing of good cause not to consolidate the petitions.
        10. Appeal. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the hearing examiner may appeal to the Council. On appeal, the Council shall affirm, reverse or modify the decision of the hearing examiner.
        11. Finality of Decision. The decision of the hearing examiner shall be the final decision of the Council in the event that neither party appeals to the Council. The decision of the hearing examiner shall be stayed pending appeal.
        12. Time for Decision. The rules and regulations adopted by the Program shall require final action on any individual Rent adjustment petition within a reasonable time.
      6. Decisions decreasing Rents due to reductions in services or failure to maintain the Property shall remain in effect until the hearing officer finds that the Landlord has corrected the defect warranting the decrease. The Program shall, by regulation, establish procedures for making prompt compliance determinations. Upon a determination of compliance, the Landlord shall be entitled to reinstate the prior Rent level, retroactive to the date that the Landlord notified the Program that it had corrected the defect that warranted the decrease. This shall occur in compliance with California Civil Procedure section 1942.4. If the Landlord is found to be in violation of California Civil Procedure section 1942.4, then no Rent shall be charged for the period during which the Landlord was in violation.

      6.30.170 Non-Waiverability.

      Any provision, whether oral or written, whereby any provision of this Chapter is waived, shall be deemed to be against public policy and shall be void.

      6.30.180 Judicial Review.

      A Landlord or Tenant aggrieved by any action or decision of the Program may seek judicial review by appealing to the appropriate court within the jurisdiction. No action or decision by the Program shall go into effect until thirty (30) days have expired to allow for such appeal.

      6.30.190 Remedies.

      1. Civil. Any aggrieved Tenant, or the City, may enforce the provisions of this Chapter by means of a civil action.
      2. Injunctive and Equitable Relief. Any person who commits an act or engages in any pattern and practice that violates this Chapter or its implementing regulations may be enjoined therefrom by a court of competent jurisdiction. A court may issue other equitable relief as may be necessary to prevent the use or employment by any person of any practice which violates this ordinance or as may be necessary to restore to any person in interest any money or property, real or personal, which may have been acquired through practices that violate this ordinance. An action for injunction under this Subsection 6.30.19(B) may be brought by an aggrieved Tenant, by the City Attorney, or by any person or entity who will fairly or adequately represent the interests of the protected class.
      3. Damages
        1. Damages for Relocation Payments. If a Landlord fails to provide required relocation payments in accordance with this Chapter, in addition to any other remedy under this Chapter, or at law, the Landlord shall be liable to the Tenant in a civil action for damages of not less than three times actual damages.
        2. Wrongful Eviction Damages. Any attempt to recover possession of a Rental Unit or obtain possession of a Rental Unit in violation of this Chapter shall render a Landlord liable to the Tenant in a civil action for wrongful eviction for damages of not less than three times actual damages, including damages for emotional distress. Damages for mental anguish and emotional distress shall only be trebled if the Landlord acted in knowing violation or reckless disregard of this Chapter.
        3. Damages for Excess Rent. Any Landlord who demands, accepts, receives, or retains any payment of Rent in excess of the Maximum Allowable Rent, in violation of the provisions of this Chapter or any rule, regulation or order hereunder promulgated, including the provisions ensuring compliance with habitability standards and registration fee requirements, shall be liable in a civil action to the Tenant from whom such payments are demanded, accepted, received or retained, for damages of not less than three times actual damage,. in the amount by which the payment or payments demanded, accepted, received or retained exceeds the maximum lawful Rent. If the Landlord's violation under this Subsection 6.30.190(C)(3) was willful, the Landlord shall be liable for three times actual damages.
        4. Harassment Damages. Any person who violates, or aids or incites another person to violate, the provisions of Section 6.30.140 shall be liable in a civil action for each and every such offense for money damages of not less than three times actual damages suffered by an aggrieved Tenant (including damages for mental or emotional distress), or for the minimum damages in the sum of $1,000.00, whichever is greater, and whatever other relief the Court deems appropriate. In the case of an award for damages for mental or emotional distress, the award shall be trebled only if the trier of fact finds that the Landlord acted in knowing violation of or reckless disregard of this Chapter. Moreover, any person who violates, or aids or incites another person to violate, this Chapter shall be liable for an additional civil penalty of up to $5,000.00 for each offense committed against a person who is Disabled or aged 62 or over. The court may also award punitive damages to any plaintiff, including the City, in a proper case as defined by California Civil Code section 3294 or successor statute.
      4. Attorney's Fees and Costs.
        1. Action by City Attorney. In any civil proceeding brought by the City Attorney pursuant to this Section 6.30.190, the City may, at the initiation of the proceeding, seek an award of attorney's fees. If the City seeks an award of attorney's fees, the award shall be made to the prevailing party. Court costs may be awarded to a prevailing party pursuant to state law.
        2. Action by Tenant. In any civil action brought pursuant to this Section 6.30.190, the prevailing Tenant is entitled to recover the Tenant's reasonable attorney's fees. A defendant Landlord may recover reasonable attorney's fees if the complaint brought by the Tenant was devoid of merit and brought in bad faith. Court costs may be awarded to a prevailing party pursuant to state law.
        3. Costs of Investigation. In the event the City Attorney brings a civil action, or proceeding pursuant to this Chapter, the City Attorney may recover its costs of investigation.
      5. No Exhaustion Requirement. No administrative remedy need be exhausted prior to filing suit pursuant to this Section 6.30.190.
      6. Nonexclusive Remedies and Penalties. The remedies provided in this Section 6.30.190 are not exclusive and are not intended to be exclusive of each other or to any other existing legal remedies.The remedies of this Chapter may be used cumulatively with any other remedy available at law or equity.
      7. Statute of Limitations. The statute of limitations for an action shall be three (3) years. All remedies under this Chapter are available for the entire three-year statutory period.

      Section 2. Severability - Liberal Construction.

      If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Chapter are declared to be severable. The People of Larkspur declare that they would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of the Ordinance in spite of the fact that any one or more of the same be declared unconstitutional or invalid. This Chapter shall be liberally construed to achieve the purposes of this Chapter and to preserve its validity.

      Section 3. Competing Ordinances.

      In the event that there is another ordinance on the ballot during the same election which seeks to regulate residential housing which also passes, the ordinance which obtains the higher number of votes shall be the controlling ordinance.

      Section 4. Amendment of the Larkspur Municipal Code After Filing but Prior to Adoption.

      The intent of the proposed Ordinance is to replace the currently existing provisions of the Larkspur Municipal Code concerning the regulation of residential rental housing, including rent regulation, eviction regulation, relocation payments, and tenant protections, with new, more protective statutes. These provisions are currently contained in Chapter 6.20 and 6.30. If these Chapters are moved, repealed or amended by act of the Council or voters, this Ordinance shall still serve to replace those provisions.

      Section 5. Effective Date.

      This Ordinance shall be effective only if approved by a majority of the voters voting thereon and shall go into effect ten (10) days after the vote is declared by the City Council. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute this Chapter to give evidence of its adoption by the voters.

Vote By Mail

Vote by Mail

Ballots mailed starting October 7

All active registered voters will get a ballot in the mail. Allow 7-10 days for delivery.

Common Questions

In-Person Voting

In-Person Voting

Vote at a Vote Center if you need a replacement ballot, did not register by October 21 deadline, prefer to vote in person, or on an accessible ballot marking device. Voting is accessible at all locations.

AVOID LINES - Vote early or vote by mail

  • You may vote at any location, Drop Boxes at all locations
  • November 5, 2024, all 21 Vote Centers open 7 am to 8 pm
  • See our List of Vote Centers (opens a new window) for most recent Vote Center information, including hours of operation

Military/Over-Seas Voters

Military/Over-Seas Voters

Ballots go out September 18

  • Receiving your ballot by mail
    • Ballot packet includes a Voter Guide, Ballot, Oath of Voter Form, Return Instructions and Postage-paid Return Envelope.
    • You can return your ballot by:
      • Faxed - on or before November 5 by 8 pm.
        • You MUST complete and return the Oath of Voter Form with your ballot.
      • Mailed - postmarked on or before November 5 and received by November 12.
        • You MUST date and sign the outside of your return envelope.
  • Receiving your ballot by email
    • You will receive an email from info@uocava.com with a link, access code, and instruction to access your ballot.
    • Ballot packet includes your Marked Ballot (must print), Oath of Voter Form, Return Instructions, and Postage-paid Return Envelope Image.
    • You can return your ballot by:
      • Faxed - on or before November 5 by 8 pm.
        • You MUST complete and return the Oath of Voter Form with your ballot.
      • Mailed - postmarked on or before November 5 and received by November 12.
        • You MUST date, print your name, and sign the outside of your return envelope.

Drop Box

Official Ballot Drop Box Locations

Open October 8 to November 5 until 8:00 p.m.

Drop Boxes close precisely at 8:00 p.m. on Election Day as required by law

Exterior sites available for 24 hour drop off, see our List of Drop Box Locations (opens a new window).

Each Vote Center will have a Vote by Mail Drop Box. See our List of Vote Centers Locations (opens a new window) for days and hours of operation.

Access or Language Needs

Access or Language Needs

Disability Rights California operates a Statewide Voting Hotline 7AM to 8PM on Election Day, November 5, 2024 and answers calls prior to and following the election. 1-888-569-7955